Wednesday, September 19, 2007

DEMOCRATIC HOUSE MAJORITY LEADER ATTACKS COLLEAGUE FOR TELLING TRUTH ABOUT AIPAC

THE HILL - House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) went after fellow Democrat Jim Moran of Virginia, calling on him to retract his comments about the Israel lobby. "His remarks were factually inaccurate and recall an old canard that is not true, that the Jewish community controls the media and the Congress," Hoyer said at a news conference in the Capitol. In an interview published in the September-October issue of Tikkun magazine, Moran said the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, "has pushed this war from the beginning … They are so well-organized, and their members are extraordinarily powerful -most of them are quite wealthy -they have been able to exert power."

TIKKUN - Rabbi Lerner asks Congressman Steny Hoyer and Congressman Eric Cantor to apologize not only to Congressman Moran but also to all American Jews who support peace and reconciliation in the Middle East. It took tremendous courage for Congressman Jim Moran to tell Tikkun magazine of the power and influence of AIPAC and other sections of the Israel Lobby. AIPAC is often described in the media as the most powerful lobby in Washington, D.C., so it is no surprise that its friends and supporters are now mobilizing to vilify Congressman Moran's comments.

House Republican Chief Deputy Whip Eric Cantor likened Congressman Moran to Adoph Hitler on September 18th. "Unfortunately, Jim Moran has made it a habit now to lash out to the American Jewish commnunit6\y. I think his remarks are reprehensible, I think his remarks are anachronistic, and hearken back to the day of Adolph Hitler, of the others, Mein Kamp, of the protocols of the elders of zion, other sources that have become reference to now, I'm sorry to say, a resurgent anti-semitic sentiment world wide."

And House Democratic Majority Leader Steny Hoyer issued a statement which seemed to add to the witch hunt by stating that Moran had claimed that "the Jewish community controls the press, the media, the Congress, and other institutions" and that therefore Moran "certainly oughta retract remarks, and indicate he believes that he was inaccurate on the facts." Congressman Moran said no such thing.

Steny Hoyer, defeated anti-war Congressman John Murtha for the Democratic leadership post he now holds, and is reportedly one of the major forces inside the Democratic leadership rejecting any serious attempt to withhold funds for the war in Iraq and limiting what Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi might otherwise try to do to challenge Bush's war, is a perfect example of the power of the Israel Lobby to shape public discourse

What's new is that now that same McCarthyism (which labeled as "anti-American" anyone who criticized U.S. policies around the world, tactics actually first developed by the Stalinists all around the world who called "anti-socialist" anyone who criticized the brutal dictatorship of the Soviet Union), is now being used not on someone criticizing Israel, but on someone who dares criticize an American organization that has played a leading role in defending the most right-wing policies of the State of Israel. As former Israel Minister of Justice Yossi Beilin points out in an interview in Tikkun magazine, AIPAC does not defend and support the Israeli government's policies when Israel tried to move toward peace under Yitzhak Rabin - in fact, he reports, they actually sought to undermine Rabin's peace efforts.

4 Comments:

At September 21, 2007 4:28 AM, Blogger montag said...

I was born and bred in the USA. I had the fairy-tale image of the State of Israel - Molly Picon in the play "Milk and Honey"- for a long time.

It took me a long time to learn a simple truth: there are different types of Israelis. There is Meir Kahane and there is Yitzhak Rabin.

In the past, there was little controversy about AIPAC's condemnations.
Things seem to be changing.
If AIPAC has abused its power and if that leads to a backlash against AIPAC influence, how will AIPAC characterize the backlash?
Will it be "a surge of resentment?" Or a "change in opinion".
Or will it be a "Kristallnacht"?
Or a "Wannsee Conferenz"?
Shall we learn to speak German like a 1930's Berliner in order to evaluate the statements of AIPAC and its supporters?

Perhaps Steny Hoyer may enlighten us.

 
At September 22, 2007 6:51 AM, Anonymous Mairead said...

I, too, came of age with the relentlessly propagandised fairytale image of Israel. It makes me wonder how many people were involved, to produce such a well-polished story so utterly at odds with historical fact.

It seems to have been an phenomenally successful propaganda effort. Who did it to us? How many of them knew what they were doing? How many did it for money? Who orchestrated it? Who turned a blind eye to it?

Those feel like important questions, to me.

 
At September 22, 2007 5:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And with those thoughts in mind, let the anti-semite bashing begin.

 
At September 28, 2007 5:26 AM, Blogger montag said...

I am not clear on what "anonymous" wrote.

They probably meant something like " the preceding comments are pernicious and will lead to anti-semitism."

Well, once more the idea that questioning AIPAC is iniquitous to the well being of Judaeism is outrageously bizarre.
(Even Elie Wiesel did not uncritically accept everything done by the State of Israel.)

It is outrageously bizarre because it is trapped in time !
This was the point of my comment and 1930s Berlin - it comes from a symbolic scenario of being a Jew from 1933 to 1945. If only we could see what was to come, we would not criticize!
To criticize is to support Herr Hitler!

Hitler is dead.
The Holocaust is not an event that goes on forever...it began, it ended. We remember it forever, but it is a memory.

Only in the minds of those who see the Holocaust as some symbolic eternal event is criticism forbidden...or verboten.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home