Thursday, October 4, 2007

AN INCREDULOUS RAY SUAREZ DISCOVERS THAT NOT ALL HILL LEGISLATION REFLECTS THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE

MIKE GRAVEL - Look what we're trying to do with Iran right now. Last week, the Lieberman resolution -- he's the guy that wrote the resolution with Iraq and killed over 3,000 Americans and a million Iraqis. And now he comes forward with another resolution, and the leadership of the Democratic Party in the Senate doesn't even have the brains or the judgment to recognize what he's doing. Sanctions on the Republican Guard? They already have sanctions. The U.N. passed them in March, Resolution 1747. What is the game they're playing right now to have sanctions? I mean, this was AIPAC that put Lieberman up to do this. This is disaster...

RAY SUAREZ (incredulous): You're saying that the national legislature of this country, rather than doing the will of the citizens of the United States, passed that Iran resolution, sanctioning the Republican Guard, because of the American-Israeli Political Action Committee?

MIKE GRAVEL: Wait a second. They'll be some information coming out about how this thing was drafted. So the answer is yes, the short answer.

If we touch Iran and they respond, you're talking about, in the minimum, a world depression, because the oil industry will just get shut down at the Straits of Hormuz. That's the minimum.

The worst that will happen will be a nuclear exchange, and I don't think we'll ever be able to contain once they start shooting bombs at each other nuclear devices. This is what's at stake with this resolution. And it's the height of immorality, irresponsibility, and the United States Senate, with the Democrats in charge, voted for the passage of this resolution. It doesn't get any worse than that, Ray.

4 Comments:

At October 6, 2007 5:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This has no relevance to the article immediately above, but I'm curious as to why the two preceeding articles just before it have their Comments page accessible only through Google 'subscribers-only' access.
Is this to cut down on the number of comments that might possibly disagree with the editor's received opinions, or am I just being paranoid?

 
At October 6, 2007 9:07 AM, Blogger TPR said...

You grossly overestimate the amount of time your editor has to engage in such nefarious and futile activities. It is likely to have been a problem with Blogger. - Sam

 
At October 6, 2007 9:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's a pretty frequent problem, unfortunately (I've seen at least half a dozen entries here where the Google subscriber-only page pops up).

May not be nefarious, but it's mighty damn annoying.

 
At October 7, 2007 9:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

+1 on the "mighty damn annoying".

This software is either broken or badly set up, Sam. There are several symptoms, of which the listed annoyance is only one.

--Mairead

 

Post a Comment

<< Home