Thursday, November 8, 2007

NEIL BUSH TIME LINE

1985

Neil Bush joins the board of Silverado S&L, serves until 1988. Silverado loans his partners in JNB $132 million which they never repay. Silverado will eventually collapse at a taxpayer cost of $1 billion.

1983

Neil Bush forms his first oil company. He puts in $100, his partners contribute $160,000 and Neil is named president of the firm, JNB Exploration.

1989

Neil Bush bails out of JNB Exploration, the firm where he became president with a $100 ante, leaving his partners to worry about its debt. Days earlier he forms Apex Energy with a personal investment of $3000. The rest of the money -- $2.7 million -- comes from an SBA program designed to help "high risk start-up companies." Like JNB, it proves to be just that. Apex will later go belly-up with no assets.

1990

Federal regulators give Bush son Neil the mildest possible penalty in the $1 billion failure of the Silverado S&L. The deal is so good that Bush drops his appeal. Among other things, Neil, as a Silverado director, voted to approve over $100 million in loans to his business partners.

1991

Neil Bush bails out of Apex Energy after collecting $320,000 in salary plus expenses. Bill Daniels, cable-TV magnate who has been lobbying against regulation of the cable industry, offers Neil a job. According to a representative, he "thought Neil deserved a second chance."

1999

Neil Bush makes at least $798,00 in three stock trades in a single day of a company where he had been employed as a consultant. The company, Kopin Corporation of Taunton, Massachusetts, announced good news about a new Asian client that sent its stock value soaring. Bush stated that he had no inside knowledge and that his financial advisor had recommended the trades. He said, "any increase in the price of the stock on that day was purely coincidental, meaning that I did not have any improper information." When asked, in January 2004, about the stock trades, Bush contrasted the capital gains he reported in 1999 and 2000 with the capital losses on Kopin stock he reported ($287,722 in all) in 2001. [Wikipedia]

Bush co-founds Ignite! Learning, an educational software corporation. Bush has said he started Austin-based Ignite! Learning six years ago because of his learning difficulties in middle school and those of his son, Pierce Bush. The software uses multiple intelligence methods to provide varying types of content to appeal to multiple learning styles. To fund Ignite!, Bush raised $23 million from U.S. investors, including his parents, Barbara and former President George Bush, as well as businessmen from Taiwan, Japan, Kuwait, the British Virgin Islands and the United Arab Emirates, according to documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Russian billionaire expatriate Boris Berezovsky, Berezovsky's partner Badri Patarkatsishvili, Kuwaiti company head Mohammed Al Saddah, and Chinese computer executive Winston Wong are documented investors. [Wikipedia]

2003

Washington Post reports that Bush's salary from Ignite! is $180,000 per year.

2007

Boris Berezovsky, a political enemy of Russian President Vladimir Putin is under indictment for fraud in Russia and an applicant for asylum in the United Kingdom. Berezovsky has been an investor in Bush's Ignite! program since at least 2003. Bush met with Berezovsky, who has been described as "notorious" and a "wheeler-dealer," in Latvia. The meeting caused tension between that country and Russia due to Berezovsky's fugitive status. Bush has also been seen in Berezovsky's box at a British soccer stadium for a game. [Wikipedia]

NY TIMES - Ignite includes as investors his parents, former President George H. W. Bush and his wife, Barbara. Company officials say that about 100 school districts use the Curriculum on Wheels, known as the Cow, which is a portable classroom with software to teach middle-school social studies, science and math. The units cost about $3,800 each and require about $1,000 a year in maintenance.

14 Comments:

At November 8, 2007 5:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeez, it's nice to know some other politico has a history of evil doings than the Clintons.

 
At November 8, 2007 6:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes there are many of them. They get featured here regularly. We're sorry if you Clinton lovers only remember the stuff you disagree with.

 
At November 9, 2007 6:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Someone should sit down with a calculator and figure out the exact ratio of Clinton scandal stories as opposed to Bush or other pol scandal stories that appear here regularly and see what the figures come out to. Some folks might be surprised.

 
At November 9, 2007 6:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonder when some readers here might develop the maturity levels that would allow them to realize that disagreement with some of what Sam is doing here doesn't equate the disagree-ers to being "Clinton lovers". Probably never, I suspect, since this site does seem to carry a heavy freightage of folks who can only see things in the simplest black-n-white terms.

 
At November 9, 2007 12:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonder when some readers here will learn to just skip over articles on subjects they have no interest in instead of complaining about the existence of those articles over and over. Probably never.

(If you're not a Clinton lover, why dost thou protest so much? You will probably not change Sam's mind about what to cover and it just seems to irritate you when people defend his choices.)

 
At November 9, 2007 12:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sigh. The minds of the puerile and childish can never be accesible to reason, ever; and if you don't believe this, just keep reading.

 
At November 9, 2007 12:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shut the fuck up, 9:48 and stop telling others what they should and shouldn't read or comment on. Usual 'progressive' big-mouth ranting about 'freedom of speech' up until you read or hear something that doesn't agree with your own sacrosanct opinions. The only one here "protesting too much" is thyself.

 
At November 9, 2007 1:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:53 sure nailed that one.

 
At November 9, 2007 4:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a pretty peculiar comment, 9:56, considering that it was you who first suggested that Sam shouldn't be using his freedom of speech to criticize the Clintons.

 
At November 9, 2007 5:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

347 here.

Learn to parse out what you read, please. I never stated that "Sam should not use his freedom of speech to criticize the Clintons", I said that it was getting to the point that he seems to be doing it to the exclusion of other, I believe more pertinent reportage, re. the trolls now occupying the White House. I'm not responsible for the comments of the poster at 956, though I don't in essence necessarily disagree with what he/she is saying; since in fact, it was yourself, 126 who advised that those who disagree with what they read here should cease reading and refrain from comment--which sure as hell doesn't make you sound like a very convincing advocate for freedom of speech yourself.

 
At November 10, 2007 4:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've always found one of TPR's greatest strengths is its nonpartisan forthrightness when covering the crimes and corruption of the ruling elite, be they corporate-owned Democrats or Republicans. Thank you, Sam, for your consistency.

 
At November 11, 2007 8:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It does have that strength, but I'm afraid where the Clintons are concerned, it also sometimes exhibits clear signs of obsessive disorder. Some of the articles here concerning the Clintons seem to be more of a dislay of rampant paralogia than of concern for grounded, factual reportage, re. the Kathleen Willey screed a few articles back.

 
At November 12, 2007 5:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the likelihood of a Clinton nomination and potential November victory were not so strong, accusations of obsession might hold some validity.
As circumstances presently stand, imperative exhortation seems a more accurate description.
Caveat emptor.
No one can say Sam didn't try to warn you...
And so it goes

 
At November 12, 2007 5:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some of the readers share the obsessive disorder, 501. That's who these 'stories' pander to.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home