Friday, January 11, 2008

FOIL FOR LONGTIME HILLARY CLINTON CON IS NO MORE

NY TIMES, OCTOBER 2007 - For more than a decade, one piece of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's informal biography has been that she was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, the conqueror of Mount Everest. The story was even recounted in Bill Clinton's autobiography. But yesterday, Mrs. Clinton's campaign said she was not named for Sir Edmund after all.

"It was a sweet family story her mother shared to inspire greatness in her daughter, to great results I might add," said Jennifer Hanley, a spokeswoman for the campaign.

In May 1953, Sir Edmund and his Sherpa guide, Tenzing Norgay, became the first men to reach the summit of Mount Everest. In 1995, shortly after meeting Sir Edmund, Mrs. Clinton said that her mother, Dorothy Rodham, had long told her she was named for the famous mountaineer. . .

Even though Bill Clinton repeated the story in his 2004 autobiography, "My Life," Hillary Clinton did not mention it in her own autobiography, "Living History," which was published in 2003.

But one big hole has been poked in the story over the years, both in cyberspace and elsewhere: Sir Edmund became famous only after climbing Everest in 1953. Mrs. Clinton, as it happens, was born in 1947.

6 Comments:

At January 11, 2008 7:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hillary and Norgay weren't the first to reach the summit, they were the first to survive getting there and back.

But then Americans apparently think Hitler was a liberal, so one's surprise may be unwarranted.

 
At January 13, 2008 8:44 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This isn't the first time this "breaking news story" has been printed here--and honestly Sam, dontcha think this is scraping the bottom of the barrel just a wee bit? Must be running out of HRC bashing material, if the best you can produce is a recycled version of an utterly irrelevant bit of trivia such as this.

 
At January 14, 2008 11:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regardless of the headline and the Clinton tie-in, this is still news.

 
At January 15, 2008 1:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why?

 
At January 15, 2008 3:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you imagine you're being clever? For as long as news media have existed, it has been traditional to regard the death of a world-famous person as news.

 
At January 16, 2008 5:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And your comment is pertinent to precisely what, regarding this story?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home