NY TIMES & WASHINGTON POST SCREW JOHN EDWARDS
NY TIMES PUBLIC EDITOR: I'll cite just one case where I don't think The Times is paying enough attention. . . Clinton and Obama have been profiled twice each on the front page since Labor Day, but Edwards not at all this year. Throughout the paper, The Times has published 47 articles about Clinton since Labor Day, only 18 about Edwards.
WASHINGTON POST OMBUDSMAN - Democratic readers have rightly complained that John Edwards didn't get the coverage he deserved.
ONE WEEK OF BIASED MEDIA COVERAGE
4 Comments:
John Edwards is a charlatan, a multi-millionaire who pretends at populism. Who cares if he gets screwed. He's as bad as Obama or Clinton when you get right to the policies he would allow. Multi-millionaires don't care about average Americans, and they ESPECIALLY don't care about average Americans when they run for office on the pretense of populism.
I'd be more angry about how the media destroyed Mike Gravel by "benign" neglect.
NYTimes Censors Ron Paul
Michael Kraft
Charlotte Conservative News
Sunday January 20, 2008
This is the third piece I have written today about the blatent and disgusting censorship of Ron Paul aftebeat John McCain today and finished second in all voting in Nevada’s primary.
Ron Paul finished second today beating McCain, Thompson, Giuliani and Huckabee in Nevada.
yet the rag newspaper New York Times found a way to continue to ignore Ron Paul.
The “official results page” on the New York Times website does not even list Ron Paul as a candidate.
Ron Paul has led Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson in almost every state so far and has finished second today which is higher than either of them have finished anywhere.
(Article continues below)
But the New York times thinks this isn’t worth their ink to print.
Ron Paul out performed Senator Edwards today 3 to 1 in percentage points but still they dont even print his name.
The New York Times apparently received the phone call informing them not to give any publicity to Ron Paul, and like a good little corporate tool, they listened.
Explain this image, explain why the 4rth highest ranking candidate is not listed amongst the 6 candidates on the “official results” page?
Welcome to the corruption party New York Times, I will spool your paper and keep it next to my toilet.
Besides, Wendigo, you forget to mention Edwards involvement in the 911 cover-up and his inside connections to the destruction of the WTC.
What's wrong with you, are you starting to slip?
Have the feds gotten to you and subjected you to some kind of mind altering manipulation?
On an other topic, wouldn't you just love to have a piece of the ALCOA concession for the Gravel campaign? One more reason we must keep recycling.
Oh hell yes! The millions of people who see the official line on 9/11 can't possibly be true are wingnuts! We can't just LEAVE NOW from Iraq and Afghanistan because that would seem as if we're a bunch of idiot cowardly spineless followers who care more about seeming propriety than human life. Ron Paul would pardon all nonviolent drug offenders. As chief law enforcement officer, he would do that. He would bring our trooops home. As commander in chief of armed forces, he would do that. While you fakeass self appointed martyrs are waiting for God or Jesus to run for prez (Edwards would end the war when it became a suitable photo op), people are dying. I Know that's no skin off your ass, but try to have a heart even if you have to buy one.
Post a Comment
<< Home