NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CONCEALED PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT RESTRICTING PROTESTS ON THE MALL; PAST USERS NOT NOTIFIED
ANSWER COALITION - At a public meeting called by the National Park Service in Washington, D.C., representatives from the Partnership for Civil Justice, ANSWER Coalition, Nicaragua Network, Grassroots America, ImpeachBush.org and others demanded that there be no new restrictions placed on the right of the people to access the National Mall for free speech activities.
The National Park Service is undertaking an plan similar to that launched to exclude protests from New York City's Great Lawn. It will be used to further restrict or ban protest on the Mall from current levels. This is part of a nationwide campaign of corporate-sponsored organizations working in partnership with government entities that claim that protests, rallies and demonstrations harm grass, green space or natural resources and must therefore be restricted or banned or shunted off to designated protest pits. The National Mall has been used for decades as the site for mass assembly protest and gatherings.
A lawsuit filed by the Partnership for Civil Justice on behalf of the National Council of Arab Americans and the ANSWER Coalition successfully overturned regulations in New York City that were used to prevent mass assembly protest in the Great Lawn of Central Park during the Republican National Convention
The NPS has set up a "public-private" partnership that allows business interests and real estate developers -- in coordination with the government -- to determine the future of the National Mall. The Jan. 12 public meeting was intended to have low attendance to allow the government to claim public involvement while simultaneously excluding it. When confronted with the fact that they had done no legitimate outreach about the public meeting to the hundreds of thousands of people who have actually used the National Mall, the President of the Trust for the National Mall responded that she had sent notice to the Board of Trade. The NPS issues 3,000 permits a year for the use of the National Mall, but there has been no effort to notify any of those organizations about the proposed changes.
TO WRITE THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE


1 Comments:
I traveled to D.C. with VVAW for the 1970 May Day protest against the continuation of that war. Our permit to camp in a D.C. park was denied. Ramsey Clark argued our case pro bono before several courts. Permit still denied. We camped anyway for a week or so. I'm sure what saved us from getting a beating from D.C. police was the presence of diasabled vets in wheelchairs. One guy had five Purple Hearts. Of course there was that element of leadership who wanted the cops to rampage, hoping to create public sympathy, but the authorities were smart enough to refrain from such callous displays. The difference is that today the public and the media would be kept at some distance while we got our asses kicked. It's going to take a lot of courage to effect much change nowadays
Post a Comment
<< Home