Thursday, May 8, 2008

MAKING IT EASIER TO FIND RON PAUL SUPPORTERS

PAULVILLE The goal of Paulville is to establish gated communities containing 100% Ron Paul supporters and or people that live by the ideals of freedom and liberty. The process is forming a co-op of people buying shares in the community and these people would be granted land use at a minimum of 1 acre per share, for as long as they homesteaded the land. The community would be privately held by the co-op to establish private property for the general community thus preserving the community is 100% freedom and liberty lovers. The community votes on all community efforts, such as utilities etc. However no one is forced to consume these utilities and or pay for them, AKA people can be off grid on their share of land. This is in line with the ideals that you're free to live your life the way you want and not be forced to do or pay for other people's life styles you may not agree with. These communities are not for the faint at heard they will start as undeveloped land in non city locals, as this is the way to secure large tracts of land needed for these efforts.

However the goal is a minimal financial outlay of around $500 per share to establish this community.

2 Comments:

At May 9, 2008 9:00 AM, Blogger erastus said...

Is there a reason for posting this "news", other than to imply that Ron Paul is a kook, or all Paul supporters are kooks?

This gated community called 'Paulville' has nothing to do with Ron Paul and doesn't represent his beliefs. He is working to change the direction the country is going, not to have us isolated.

These gated-libertarian people can do what they want, but shouldn't be calling it Paulville.

 
At May 10, 2008 9:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

They can call it anything they want; the real point here is that Sam is not engaging in responsible reportage by determining whether or not Paul endorses the use of the name. If he doesn't, then Prorev is yet again guilty of smears by association, a tactic that I've noticed is not (unfortunately) either rare or unusual on this site. It mightily impairs both Sam Smith's and his publication's integrity and credibility to have to resort to it, however.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home