Wednesday, May 07, 2008

THE CORPORATE CURSE

How business culture dragged America down with it

Sam Smith

FIFTY YEARS ago, America was just a decade past the last major war it would ever win. The length of the average work week was down significantly from the 1930s but real income had been soaring and would continue do so through the 1970s. We had a positive trade balance and the share of total income gained by the top 1% of the country was only around 8%, down from 24% in the 1930s.

As Jermie D. Cullip describes it:

"From 1950 to 1959, the total number of females employed increased by 18%. The standard of living during the fifties also steadily rose. Most people expected to own a car and a house, and believed that life for their children would be even better. . . The number of college students doubled. Getting a college education was no longer for the rich or elite

"The decade of the fifties was a decade of major breakthroughs in technology. James Watson and Francis Crick won the Nobel Prize for decoding the molecular structure of DNA. Tuberculosis had all but disappeared, and Jonas Salk's vaccine was wiping out polio in the United States. . .

"Over the decade the housing supply increased 27 percent . . . Growth in the economy also led to increasing popularity of other financial intermediaries. Life insurance companies flourished for the first half of the decade and a large number of new private firms entered the market to absorb the excesses of personal savings. Savings and Loan Association holdings of mortgage loans during the decade clearly demonstrate the boom in construction at this time. In 1950 $13.6 billion was held rising to $60.1 billion in 1960. Another important growth in the 1950s capital markets was in pension funds. This industry grew from $11 billion in 1950 to $44 billion in 1960.

"By mid- 1955, the country had pulled out of the previous year's recession and gross national product was growing at a rate of 7.6 percent. The boom was so great that the budget for 1956 predicted a surplus of $4.1 billion. With the surges in production and the economy, the 1950s is often recognized as the decade that eliminated poverty for the great majority of Americans. Over the decade, GNP per capita almost doubled and the public welfare reacted accordingly as the cost of living index rose by just 1 percent and unemployment dropped to 4.1 percent'"

All in all not a bad decade to be in if you were running a business. So much so, in fact, that some began griping about it all in books like The Organization Man and plays like Death of a Salesman.

But here is the truly amazing part - given all we have been taught in recent years: America did it all as its universities turned out less than 5,000 MBAs a year.

By 2005 these schools graduated 142,000 MBAs. In the other words, in the 1950s it would take two centuries to produce a million MBAs. By 2005, with huge trade and budget deficits, a disappearing auto industry, the most costly and disastrous war since the mid 19th century, a growing gap between rich and poor, a constantly projected inability to care for our ill or elderly and a pessimism repeatedly confirmed in polls, we could produce a million MBAs in only seven years.

There are plenty of worthy arguments to be made correlating the rise of business school culture with the decline of the our economy. For example, in the period that corporate culture has been in ascendance - roughly since the Reagan years - wages of lower income workers have declined, the ratio of executive to worker pay has soared, the real value of the minimum wage has fallen by almost a third, total hours worked has increased, percent of jobs with pensions has dropped, our balance of payments has become increasingly negative, the top 1% is back to getting 21% of all income and the age at which one receives Social Security has increased.

A few years back I put it this way: "A cursory examination of American business suggests that its major product is wasted energy. Compute all the energy loss created by corporate lawyers, Washington lobbyists, marketing consultants, CEO benefits, advertising agencies, leadership seminars, human resource supervisors, strategic planners and industry conventions and it is amazing that this country has any manufacturing base at all. We have created an economy based not on actually doing anything, but on facilitating, supervising, planning, managing, analyzing, tax advising, marketing, consulting or defending in court what might be done if we had time to do it. The few remaining truly productive companies become immediate targets for another entropic activity, the leveraged buyout." And this was all before the rise of the killer hedge fund.

But that is not the issue here. If that was all there was to it, we could just wait out a few recessions or depressions and some intuitive, imaginative smart asses would get things rolling again, much as Steve Jobs or Bill Gates did once.

But the business school influence has not limited itself to business. Far from it. Over the past three decades it has done an incredibly effective job of turning all America into just so many more corporate employees desperate for a strategic vision that will foster formulations of actions and processes to be taken to attain the vision in accordance with agreed upon procedures in order to achieve a hierarchy of goals. It has - with bombast, bullying and bullshit - convinced an extraordinary number of Americans that its childishly verbose and coldly abstract culture is transferable to every human activity from running a church to driving a tractor across a field.

One need look no further than the nearest mission statement. But don't look too far back. I checked by Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary from 1996 and the phrase hadn't even appeared yet. Now it is everywhere.

To be sure, I did find this on the Internet:

"As with many of the terms currently being used in industry, mission statement is a Christian term. In Matthew 28, Jesus gave the apostles the first mission statement:

"'Then Jesus came to them and said, 'All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.'

"A mission statement has always been a summary of the basic beliefs and aims of any Christian missionary organization. So, in summary, the origins of the term go back to AD 33."

Some devoted Christian is permitting his most sacred icon to be reduced to the status of a corporate CEO and his holy gospel put on a par with business how-to books from an airport bookstore.

Admittedly, a few have stood up against the assault. The alternative newspaper Eat the State once had a mission statement that read: "Missions were created by the Catholic Church to subjugate Native Americans in California. We oppose them." And a small computer consultancy business in West London posted a sign: 'We are not ruled by a Mission Statement, we are smarter than that'. But when you start to count the number of organizations - from religious to non-profit to social to political - that feel they can't get along without some corporate gobbledygook on the inside cover of whatever they're publishing, you know the cultural invasion is complete.

At the time of the Enron collapse, I noted, "The last two administrations have been characterized by the invasive influence of an arrogant, autistic, and amoral class of late 20th century MBAs and similar members of the technocratic elite. This class has junked sixty years of social democracy, helped wreck the Russian economy, made every American worker a temp-in-waiting, carpet bombed the English language, trashed every moral concept in their way, and twisted reality so effectively they even convinced many that they were sex objects.

"And they are everywhere. You will find them running schools and universities and managing once great museums. They talk mush, think mush, market mush, report mush, and defend mush. They attempt to make up in certitude what they lack in wisdom; they can't tell the difference between a phrase and a product; and they create infantile and self-serving distortions of economic principles that they declare to be the only principles in life worth observing. They are, in the end, just so many more televangelists, but with themselves as God. Perhaps worst of all, they are without the capacity for shame. Like other sociopaths, they are remorseless."

Since then, it's only gotten worse. As a writer, I pay attention to verbal genres, whether they be the patois of public housing, sports or the board room. Over and over, I am struck by how many have adopted corporate jargon so fully that they are not aware of using it even when describing acts of love or carnal desire. I sit quietly at meetings of non-profits as someone suggests we "define goals and objectives and a map a route for achieving these goals and objectives." I begin to boil when something I love or admire is reduced to a mere "product." Still I know it is a losing battle; the corporate culture has won.

The tragedy is that each of the infected cultures, organizations and individuals once had their own culture that often was infinitely more appealing, intelligent, inspiriting and honest than that which has sullied it. Why is the corporate and business school tradition preferable to that of the church, the artist, the non-profit, the political movement or education? Is politics just branding, is art just a product, is education just a learning process, would Martin Luther King have done better if he had gone to business rather than theological school? Each of these traditions have centuries of wisdom and experience behind them, but all that is increasingly put aside to fit the corporate model.

We pay for this in numerous ways. Some are obvious such as political candidates and public officials carefully avoiding real issues in favor of creating artificial images of themselves, backed by such words as "hope" and "change." And if you don't join with the change huckster, you are accused of "fear of change."

Other effects are more subtle. For example, we now live in the second robber baron era. One of the things that happens in such times is that the wealthy and powerful get to construct huge building and homes. Yet, however we may feel about the 19th century power hoggers, we are still attracted to the architecture and structures they were rich enough to build.

Now, take a stroll through the downtown of a gentrified city of today or drive into the carelessly wealthy suburbs. Which of these buildings would you like to visit a hundred years from today? It's not the architects' fault. As a Washington architect recently noted, her clients won't let her build beautiful places; they are too concerned with getting every last dollar out of the project.

The late activist attorney George LaRoche explained it well: "Once, I think, we knew our greedy were greedy but they were obligated to justify their greed by reference to some of the other values in which all of us could participate. Thus, maybe 'old Joe' was a crook but he was also a 'pillar of the business community' or 'a member of the Lodge' or a 'good husband' and these things mattered. Now the pretense of justification is gone and greed is its own justification."

The result is a stunning lack of restraint. We find ourselves without heroism, without debate over right and wrong, with little but an endless narcissistic struggle by the powerful to get more money, more power, and more press than the next person. In the chase, anything goes and the only standard is whether you win, lose, or get caught.

Thus we find a new breed of mayors and governors who think they are running a large company. They think they should have the power of a CEO and the obedience of those below them. Citizens have become mere customers and urban policy is reduced to economic development, frequently just a synonym for payoffs to big time campaign contributors. This sort of politics is marked by arrogance and indifference to the citizenry with justifications veiled in abstractions such as "change" and "progress" - abstractions will remain unmeasured until well after the offender leaves office.

We find evidence of the damage everywhere. Such as churches that were once involved in civil rights or other progressive causes that now have become scared of anything that might endanger their budgets. In my town a few years back, two activist black preachers moved in from elsewhere. They took over local churches and within months were making waves. I dubbed them Batman & Robin. But it didn't last long. One preacher was told by his vestry to quiet down and the other was removed as head of what had been once one of the most activist congregations in town. Press a minister on what happened to religious activism and it won't be long before the budget comes up. Didn't they have budgets in the 1960s?

The same with political movements. Political campaigns are so driven by money that the media doesn't even notice that it has raised campaign contributions in its stories to a status equal to or higher than the vote, even though the Constitution suggests nothing of the sort. Supposed models of political action, such as Move On or Emily's List, are basically fund-raising and signature gathering organizations patterned on corporate principles. Movements that lead large numbers of people to promote a cause have largely disappeared, in part because their structure is so antithetical to the tacitly preferred corporate model. Could we today have a civil rights, women's, labor or gay movement of the sort that once changed America? It doesn't seem likely without a conscious rejection of corporate values that have been unconsciously accepted.

Consider also the corporatizing of public spaces: sports stadiums, public buildings and museums.. What precisely is the price that each of these places pays to "partner" with the corporate world? And what is precisely the price we pay for letting them do so?

And it is much more than just a matter of signs. In many urban areas, there is a growing interest in what are called "multi-use" facilities, which in fact are former icons of community becoming hidden in corporate high rise buildings. Thus a library or a school disappears from view and lessens in public importance by being treated like just another cafeteria in an office development.

But we hardly notice. One of the things what used to keep corporate culture in check was that, whatever its grandiose notions of itself, its most outward and visible sign was often the salesman, the man Arthur Miller had Charlie describe in his tale of the trade: "For a salesman, there is no rock bottom to the life. He don't put a bolt to a nut, he don't tell you the law or give you medicine. He's a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine."

This classic character was so ubiquitous that it seemed every other joke began with, "A salesman knocked on the door and . . . "

Then came television and the individual salesman was finished. A little ahead of the rise of business schools but deeply intertwined with them in creating today's corporaphilic culture. Think of television as the virtual salesman, not knocking on your door, but in your living and bed room 24 hours a day bringing you the products, the values, the language and the corporate inspired crudity that exemplify our time. And those who once caused Americans to close the door, hang up, or say "no thank you," now teach our children, run our government, and tell us what to think. In a few decades Willy Loman has moved from being a tragic figure to being a role model.

The corporate virus even affects the arts, that supposed haven from our lesser selves. Watch American Idol, for example, and count the number of times corporate interests intrude on the proceedings - from the participants taking part in a loudly cheered automobile ad to a handful of listener questions that serve no purpose other than to promote a phone company.

You think you're above American Idol? Think again. More votes were cast in a recent American Idol poll than Bill Clinton got the first time he ran for president. Even if we hate such manifestations of corporatized culture, we can't hide from their effect.

As a musician, I watch the show with mesmerized masochism. Why don't I like more songs? Why does the audience become so hysterical about so little? Whatever happened to melody? Why do looks and attitude swamp talent?

And then Ryan Seacrest slips into a pitch and I'm reminded that I'm just watching another commercial.

Sometimes it's just the little things. For example, I squirm every time I hear someone talk about doing a cover version of a song because I come from a time when songs belonged to everyone and, because they did, there was a lot more singing instead of just listening and screaming and waving your arms around. Once music had been created, it entered a cultural public domain. No one spoke disparagingly of the Philadelphia Orchestra doing a cover of J.S. Bach and when you picked up your horn and played a Charlie Byrd number you were probably doing the best thing you could have done that evening.

But now you find comments such as "Cheap wedding bands and party cover bands are needed in some places" but "a cover song is what a worthless bar band does to make money."

When you dig into this psyche a bit, you find not too deep down more traces of corporate culture. For the tune that has been covered is tacitly considered owned by the first to record it in a fiscally successful way. Centuries of music being created and then being happily replayed has been turned into one more intellectual copyright issue, coincidentally eliminating the ancient distinction between composer and musician.

But cultures don't grow by copyright; they grow by sharing: values, experience, fun, strengths, words, weaknesses and music. In a thriving culture everyone in some way covers everyone else.

One of the most tragic manifestations of corporate overload can be found in our school system and efforts to allegedly reform it. To use standardized tests as the sole criteria of someone's achievement ignores matters such as wisdom, judgment, social factors and morality. If you educate kids in such a manner you basically end up with adults able to absorb a large amount of data but often incapable of using it sensibly in a social situation. The last thing we want to do is to train our children to be as socially dysfunctional as some of our leaders.

As John Taylor Gatto has put it:

"There's a widespread feeling these days, both here and abroad, that America has lost its way, that we've gone crazy, and that school has something to do with it. Personally, I agree. But what change in schooling could restore our lost national vigor?

"Since 1983, the answer from policy circles has been: even more of the same. More hours, more days, more homework, more tests, more college, and a more coercive transfer of officially-approved curricula designed to make classrooms teacher-proof. In this tight prescription, critical thinking, artistic expression, and actual applications of learning have received short shrift. But what if regimented schooling is the disease making us sick and not its cure?"

Perhaps most discouraging is that the very institutions that could once be counted upon to help American correct its mistakes and move on to better days have become as corporatized as everything else. The names are there - environmental protection, civil rights or economic justice - but the character and structure of non-profits increasingly mimic those in the corporate world, propelled in no small part by the demands of major sources of income such as corporatized foundations and the business community itself.

There are, happily, exceptions. For example, for over two decades I have sat on the board of the Fund for Constitutional Government, which has helped back a handful of activist organizations so effectively that on a single day the New York Times cited their findings three times as major substance for articles and once in an editorial. When I try to analyze why this group has worked so well I come up with a number of answers:

- Its business affairs, including the protection of its endowment, are carried out with the care for detail and internal discussion more typical of small business than of a large corporation. Although you'd never guess it from the media, it was small business that originally got America economically on its feet. We were intensely commercial, not corporate, in part because business was one of the few ways one could escape the social and economic hierarchy of the times. Throughout our history it has repeatedly been the little guy with the big idea who has made a difference. But this requires a strikingly different approach, as different, say, as that between the military and a sports team. In small business, there is less time and tolerance for irrelevant abstractions, more attention to detail (what corporate officials would call "micromanaging"), more leeway for individualism and more respect for imagination and novelty. Sadly, fewer and fewer Americans have direct experience with small enterprise and more and more work for large corporations and institutions

- The organization has a goal that integrates the economic and social sides of its being not unlike they used to say of Quakers: they came to this country to do good and do very well. In many aspects of our culture we are repeatedly told that we can't have this or do that for economic reasons. But why, in such a corporaphilic time, are we less able to do what we want or have what we need then in simpler times? One possible answer: the corporate solutions offered these days aren't all that good.

- You can easily test out a group's raison d'etre by attending a board meeting and calculating how much time is spent on matters that, if you had just wandered accidentally into the room, would in no way identify the organization's reason for existence. This includes all discussions of budgets, by-law changes, and most mission statements. Bear in mind that one of the most important American organizations of the last century was the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. It went some 40 years without bylaws or a constitution.

The Fund for Constitutional Government met all these criteria, but fewer and fewer non profits do.

Sadly, for too many, America has become one big standardized test. Between exams we are meant to listen, obey and buy. And suffer the stress that this involves.

But humans have risen against worst oppressions. The main power of this one is that it so unseen, so unmentioned, so undebated. It is time to rise up against the corporate culture killers and send them back to their offices so America can learn to be America once again. We need to tear up our mission statements and start to actually do something. We need to trash our strategic visions and regain our ability to see things as they really are.

The perhaps surprising thing is that if the corporate world stuck to business and let every other aspect of American culture thrive in its own way again, if it stopped trying to boss us around and swallow us up with its infantile words and principles, everyone's bottom line would be better off. We might even feel as good about ourselves as we did fifty years ago.

21 Comments:

At 12:56 PM, Anonymous wellbasically said...

I thought about this when I heard the guy from the Dresden Dolls (a retro cabaret singer / piano player act) talking about his products and offerings.

There are a lot of reasons for this happening, as an artist it isn't easy to accept that this is the best way to go. But most culture unfortunately is shit. Maybe what your seeing is the vast expansion of that. Here's Conrad, in another context of course:

"It
is very probable that, had the Battle of Salamis never been fought,
the face of the world would have been much as we behold it now,
fashioned by the mediocre inspiration and the short-sighted labours
of men. From a long and miserable experience of suffering,
injustice, disgrace and aggression the nations of the earth are
mostly swayed by fear--fear of the sort that a little cheap oratory
turns easily to rage, hate, and violence."

I have yammered here and other places about the collapse of the economy in the 70s and the reasons for that, primarily because the dollar was devalued on the sayso of economists on the Commanding Heights. The history of the Modernist Era at least in my field, has been a desperate attempt to take those heights by one group or another, and you do it by boiling out the personal and individual.

Finally they gave up and called the End of Art. People are still making art, but to me the economy of it resembles the middle class age of Rembrandt rather than the Church-centered Renaissance. Yes a lot of shit is created. But aren't we better off without the commands coming down from above?

 
At 10:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

1. Never allow minority people to become disproportionate number of university professors, they will favor their own and slowly dominate banking, news media.

2. Don't allow minority people own/run mainstream media - TV, Radio, New papers. But allow minority people full freedom to run their own TV, Radio, Newspapers for their own community.

3. Don't allow minority people to run mainstream Banks. But allow minority people full freedom to run banks for their own community.

4. When minority people dominate Education, News media, Banking at least understand that they are manipulating the society and take immediate steps to "Nationalize" all three key social institutions and restrict the minority community participation in these three key social institutions to percentage of their population.

5. Social progress and prosperity happens only when all segments of the society participate in proportion to their numerical strength in key social institutions like Eduction, News media, Banking. Anything else will lead to decay of the society.

 
At 12:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That was a great article. Very well said.

Do you think if lobbying was abolished or banned that things could change?

 
At 12:48 AM, Anonymous Greg Pyatt said...

Shockingly-good article Mr. Smith! It's a shame that it has to share the same page with the comment by "anonymous" and his rants against the scary, ever-threatening world of minority control.

Anyways, I think you pretty much nailed it when you mentioned that even the true believer Christian had been co-opted by corporate culture. This cultural slave then went to justify his own slave master by finding Biblical "proof" of its Heaven-ordained status. Brilliant. Tragic. Sublime.

Are you always this good? Consider me a subscriber. Well done.

 
At 1:42 AM, Blogger Mike Kramlich / ZodLogic said...

great article. i've arrived at some similar conclusions about America.

 
At 2:10 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for reminding us the CEO has no clothes. Great analogy about televangelist as CEO. Corporate communism has persisted far too long we need to return to real sense of capitalism.

 
At 2:52 AM, Blogger The Narrator said...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
At 2:57 AM, Blogger The Narrator said...

I think the all-hail-the-mighty-dollar philosophy of the last 20 or so years has come about due to the amount of funny money floating around in the financial sector. The funny money has come back from the Asian central banks who we run big trade deficits with. It has spewed into the U.S credit markets and grown exponentially vs. the rest of the economy.

This has caused an enormous power shift to public companies and others who can issue endless debt and buy up all sorts of honest little companies. The honest little companies are corporatized and ruined via armies of B.S spewing MBAs. These same companies fund the non-profits, etc. who have to beg indirectly at the feet of the all mighty financial sector and its borrowers for money.

Meanwhile the non-financial speculating class who should be the core of the social movements are flat broke due to rising housing and health care costs and stagnant wages.

 
At 3:42 AM, Blogger Sam Coles said...

A eloquent essay that mirrors my feelings exactly. Well done!

 
At 5:49 AM, Blogger wejde said...

Great essay. Spot on.
I'm afraid that things will never go back to what they once were. History - and reality in general - cannot be made to enter the bottle once it has escaped. Your corporate structure og culture is here to stay albeit not in the same form. It triumphed because it was stronger in some ways (not nessecarely in the long run) but in some crucial ways. I belive it will not survive the dissolving af the nation-state that also is happening in this age. Rather it will in the end compliment it, i.e. large corporations, multinational corporations etc. will adopt some of the ways that signify states (and the citicen relationship the nation retains with its humans). Policing, protection af outside attack, enviroment responsibility, taxing etc. will become a conglomerate of private (corporate) and public (nation) responsebility.

 
At 6:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am afraid that what you've said sounds accurate to me. I work for a large, iconic American corporation and most of my co-workers and I see this waste every day. We belittle corporate emails, shake our heads when the latest round of re-organizations come or when objectives change, mostly because we have really been hurt by poor higher management but can't really do much (in fact, the official feedback mechanism that would record our concerns has been constructed in such a way that we cannot express concerns about any management decisions other than our own, 'direct' manager). Not only do they not 'get their hands dirty' with actual work, they also refuse to hear when things are going wrong .

 
At 7:45 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Greg Pyatt's response to anonymous and his 'rants' (which in the corporate culture is generally code for telling it like it is) is symptomatic of another major problem in this country, and this is reinforced by the resigned fatalism of a couple of other comments here. People - real, living, breathing, greedy, people are responsible for corporaphilia (great word!), and things can be done to resist them. We all need to recognise that the ways things have gone is not ordained other than through the will of particular people. The corporate culture did not magic its way into existence. People created it. The trail can be followed.
Be aware of who is responsible. Yes, it's a big team, from bankers to Bill O'Reilly, but not as big as those who are becoming increasingly sick of it all.
Don't co-operate, or if you must, do the absolute minimum to accede to the demands of your 'superiors'. Just one small example: if you are asked to fill in a satisfaction questionnaire, don't, or note on it that you thinks it's b.s. (People do this, you know, or at least the ones who aren't gutless.)
Don't buy into corporatism (unless you're forced to work as part of it); nobody forces you to shop at Wal-Mart, etc. In fact, consumer power is the only realistic option we have now.
Stop watching mainstream news, and reading mainstream media. Why do you need to if you've got people like Sam Smith, etc.?
Don't buy on credit. This is the corporate beast's biggest meal.
See how far you can go without spending MONEY! A day? That's a good start. The loss of a day's income for a fuel company would show them who can really be boss: us.

 
At 9:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Detail oriented" is good. "Micromanagement" is bad. They aren't the same. I work for a small business, and the boss will make random technical decisions on low level of different projects. I understand my project much better than he does, and the vast majority of his changes make no sense. "Detail oriented" would mean he follows the projects closely and gives suggestions. "Micromanaging" doesn't imply he follows the projects closely, but does imply that he makes technical decisions instead of lower-level people who potentially understand things better. Micromanaging is antithetical to hiring people smarter than you, or even comparably smart.

 
At 10:14 PM, Anonymous Citizen said...

While I agree wholeheartedly with what you say I was saddened to find that your blog only renders correctly in a browser owned by one of the most egregious corporations on the planet - Microsoft - and not in a free browser such as Firefox. That is free as in libre, not free as in 'no charge'.

Open Source software is one of the few effective counters to corporatism in the world of technology. I am happy to see its principles being extended into other areas, for example the biosciences. There is hope that this beast can be defeated, but it is going to take a long time to do it - without a bloody revolution.

 
At 1:54 PM, Anonymous Student said...

Thank you so much for this refreshing view on the ever growing majority of MBA students and their much anticipated "superiority". It's good to know that the word is out and I can only hope real action, rather than fluff talk, begins to transform the few untouched remains of non-corporate America.

 
At 5:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rolex Watches
Omega Watches
Tissot Watches
Panerai Watches
Piaget-Watches
Zenith Watches
Baume Mercier Watches
Bvlgari Watches
Concord Watches
Corum Watches
Longines Watches
Louis Vuitton Watches
Mont Blanc Watches
Oris Watches
Rado Watches

 
At 4:35 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Panerai watches

Rado watches

Vacheron Constantin watches

Patek Philippe watches

 
At 4:53 AM, Blogger hanyi said...

ugg boots
Air Max
UGG Classic Cardy Boots
UGG Classic Short Boots
UGG Ultra Short Boots
Air Max Tn 10
Max Tn(Special Edition)
Max 95
cheap ugg boots
Air Max shoes

 
At 10:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

all star nba
winter ugg boots
ugg outlet

 
At 1:39 AM, Blogger jiayi said...

Wholesale Ugg Boots
Uggs Outlet

 
At 4:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ugg Boots
Ugg Outlet
Uggs Outlet
Wholesale Ugg Boots
Air Max
Nike Air Max
Discount Ed Hardy
Cheap Ed Hardy
NBA Shoes
Nike Basketball Shoes

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

PLAY IT AGAIN, SAM

BACK TO INDEX

Your editor has been a musician for many decades. He started the first band his Quaker school ever had and played drums with bands up until 1980 when he switched to stride piano. He had his own band until the mid-1990s and has played with the New Sunshine Jazz Band, Hill City Jazz Band, Not So Modern Jazz Band and the Phoenix Jazz Band.

NOTES ON THE MUSIC

Here are a few tracks:

SAM SMITH'S DECOLAND BAND

'SHINE' 

JELLY ROLL

PHOENIX JAZZ BAND

APEX BLUES   Sam playing with the Phoenix Jazz Band at the Central Ohio Jazz festival in 1990. Joining the band is George James on sax. James, then 84, had been a member of the Louis Armstrong and Fats Waller orchestras and hadappeared on some 60 records. More notes on James

WISER MAN  Sam piano & vocal

OH MAMA  Sam piano & vocal