Thursday, May 8, 2008

MAKING IT EASIER TO FIND RON PAUL SUPPORTERS

PAULVILLE The goal of Paulville is to establish gated communities containing 100% Ron Paul supporters and or people that live by the ideals of freedom and liberty. The process is forming a co-op of people buying shares in the community and these people would be granted land use at a minimum of 1 acre per share, for as long as they homesteaded the land. The community would be privately held by the co-op to establish private property for the general community thus preserving the community is 100% freedom and liberty lovers. The community votes on all community efforts, such as utilities etc. However no one is forced to consume these utilities and or pay for them, AKA people can be off grid on their share of land. This is in line with the ideals that you're free to live your life the way you want and not be forced to do or pay for other people's life styles you may not agree with. These communities are not for the faint at heard they will start as undeveloped land in non city locals, as this is the way to secure large tracts of land needed for these efforts.

However the goal is a minimal financial outlay of around $500 per share to establish this community.

12 Comments:

At May 9, 2008 12:00 PM, Blogger erastus said...

Is there a reason for posting this "news", other than to imply that Ron Paul is a kook, or all Paul supporters are kooks?

This gated community called 'Paulville' has nothing to do with Ron Paul and doesn't represent his beliefs. He is working to change the direction the country is going, not to have us isolated.

These gated-libertarian people can do what they want, but shouldn't be calling it Paulville.

 
At May 10, 2008 12:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

They can call it anything they want; the real point here is that Sam is not engaging in responsible reportage by determining whether or not Paul endorses the use of the name. If he doesn't, then Prorev is yet again guilty of smears by association, a tactic that I've noticed is not (unfortunately) either rare or unusual on this site. It mightily impairs both Sam Smith's and his publication's integrity and credibility to have to resort to it, however.

 
At May 12, 2008 12:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Both of you seem to need a refresher course in deductive reasoning. Sam posted an article he believed to be of potential interest to his readers without applying any editorial comment or implying one way or another whether Ron Paul himself endorsed it. Too many commenters here attribute beliefs to Sam that are actually the beliefs of the original author of the article.

 
At May 12, 2008 7:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Given the nature of TPR, it's being willfully naive to claim that articles quoted don't tend to reflect Sam's views. TPR makes no secret of being a partisan publication, which is fine, but it's still misleading and not particularly responsible journalism on Sam's part not to have ascertained independently whether or no Paul endorses this use of his name. Given the fact that Sam has made little secret of his feelings as regards Paul and his politics, I don't think it's defective deductive reasoning to suppose that Sam would have likely published this article with pejorative intent towards Paul.

 
At May 12, 2008 8:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ron Paul would, as commander-in-chief, free all nonviolent federal drug prisoners, recall all U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, and close all overseas U.S. bases. What could be more "progressive" than that?

 
At May 13, 2008 9:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's fine,4:23. Just keep on making baseless assumptions colored by your personal prejudices. Eventually the universe will bite you in the butt bigtime, giving you an opportunity to learn to think.

 
At May 13, 2008 7:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Baseless assumptions colored by MY personal predjudices"? It was SAM who featured a predjudical story tangentially about Ron Paul, using 'baseless assumptions' with regard to a gated community that has elected to refer to itself as 'Paulville', and neither Sam, nor the writer of the article has bothered to inform us of whether or no Paul endorsed the use of his name by this community's inhabitants. Whether or no the universe elects to "bite me in the butt big time" (lovely your wish to see my presumed ignorance enlightened, that) It won't do much apparently toward teaching you to think with any level of discernment, as opposed to merely swallowing whole and unparsed whatever your hero Sam chooses to spoon out to you.

 
At May 14, 2008 10:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for giving me a big belly laugh. Now you have not only made unwarranted assumptions about both the story and Sam's reasons for posting it, but you have started making assumptions about my personal opinions as well, even though you don't know me and the only opinion I have given here is that you don't know how to think. Go ahead. Fire up your next brilliant reply and provide a little more evidence in support of my opinion.

 
At May 14, 2008 10:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would, if your retort wasn't so blindingly erroneous and egregiously stupid that it provides a far better demonstration of your lack of ability to think or read comprehensively than anything I could post by way of reply.

 
At May 15, 2008 11:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ah yes. Name calling. The last resort of those with no meaningful arguments.

 
At May 28, 2008 6:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just answering in the same spirit as your above post, 10:31. Your obliviousness to that surprises me not at all either.

 
At May 28, 2008 6:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course the fact that you obviously can't make a reply to the central point of my initial comments (that Sam has made no attempt to show that Paul supports or endorses the use of his name by this community, the answer to which might clear up some of the suppositions implied by the article's headline)tends to suggest that your own arguments are pretty lacking in meaningfulness...and your obliviousness to that fact comes as no sort of surprise as well.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home