Thursday, August 7, 2008

BOTH PARTIES DEEP INTO CORRUPT MONEY GAME

Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone - Remember the total, hideous, inexcusable absence of oversight that has been the great hallmark of George Bush's America for almost eight years now? Well, now we're getting to see that same regulatory malfeasance applied to yet another cornerstone of our political system. The Federal Election Commission - the body that supposedly enforces campaign-finance laws in this country - has been out of business for more than six months. That's because Congress was dragging its feet over confirmation hearings for new FEC commissioners, leaving the agency without a quorum. The commission just started work again for the first time on July 10th under its new chairman, Donald McGahn, a classic Republican Party yahoo whose chief qualifications include representing Tom DeLay, the corrupt ex-speaker of the House, in matters of campaign finance.

Apart from the obvious absurdity of not having a functioning election-policing mechanism in an election year in the world's richest democracy, the late start by the FEC makes it almost impossible for the agency to do its job. The commission has a long-standing reluctance to take action in the last months before a vote, a policy designed to help prevent federal regulators from influencing election outcomes. Normally, the FEC tries to root out infractions and loopholes - fining campaigns for incomplete reporting, or for taking shortcuts around spending limits - in the early months of a campaign season. But that ship sailed way too long ago to take the stink off the 2008 race.

"The time for setting the ground rules was earlier," says Craig Holman, a lobbyist with the watchdog group Public Citizen. "There isn't time to do much now."

That's especially true given the magnitude of what we're dealing with here: the biggest pile of political contributions in the history of free elections, nearly a billion dollars given to presidential candidates in this season alone. Because the FEC has been dead in the water for so long, it's likely that we'll still be in the dark about a large chunk of this record manure pile of campaign contributions when we go to vote in November.

But that doesn't mean that a little sifting through campaign records doesn't tell us quite a lot about who's backing whom in these races. The truth is that the campaigns of both Barack Obama and John McCain are being inundated with cash from more or less exactly the same gorgons of the corporate scene. From Wall Street to the Big Oil powerhouses to the military-industrial complex, America's fat-cat business leaders know that the Animal House-style party of the last eight years that made almost all of them rich with bonuses, government contracts and bubble profits is about to come to an end, and someone is going to have to pay to clean up the mess. They want that someone to be you, not them, and they've spared no expense to make sure both presidential candidates will be there to bail them out next year.

They're succeeding. Both would-be presidents have already sold us out. They've taken the money and run - completing the cyclical transformation of the American political narrative from one of monopolistic Republican iniquity to an even more depressing tale about the overweening power of corporate money and the essentially fictitious nature of our two-party system.

In layman's terms, we've gone from being screwed to being fucked. Who knows - maybe Barack Obama will surprise us if he wins the election. But if you look at the money, it doesn't look good.

8 Comments:

At August 7, 2008 5:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think if anybody actually believes that this state of affairs has only come into play since the ascension of King George (Bush), he/she is incredibly naive and should get their head out from beneath that rock where it's apparently been stashed for some time. One of the biggest (and most quickly swept under the rug by the media) ancillary revelations to come out of the Watergate scandal was the fact that corporations donate heavily and illegally to both parties, and that tidbit of news came our way something like 35 years ago. In the total abscence of anything resembling responsible reform or regulation by either Republicans or Dems--surprise, surprise!--of course this mess would only worsen. I sometimes think that's the major reason no real change can ever take place in this country--the public has a collective memory span of about three days, maybe less, and so the revelations of governmental corruption and malfeasance come to their attention every morning as something totally new under the sun.

 
At August 7, 2008 9:33 PM, Anonymous Bleeding Heart said...

The fact that candidates have abandoned their principles before does not make John McCain a good choice foe president and does not make Barack Obama any less of an ambitious whore. If you care at all about the issues you claim you're concerned with, you should consider Ralph Nader.

 
At August 10, 2008 2:11 PM, Blogger Gimmer said...

I think now the Democrats have their own version of Neo-cons. It's these coastalcrat liberal types who have no connection with labor or middle America. Obama is their leader. They can't form a coalition in the Democratic tribe because they are clueless what the average working man or women wants or needs. It's all about stupid issues like gay marriage and being pretty. I can hardly recognize the Democratic party I knew. I loath having to vote for Obama the prefab politician and corporate clown. Obama is on the take as much as any Republican ever was and I am sickened by it.

 
At August 11, 2008 11:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I never knew that people on the East and West Coasts did not have to work for a living, and therefore can have no connection with or understanding of labor.
It's oversimplifications like the above that have helped the neocon disinformation machine undermine any credibility American liberal movements might otherwise have. Been listening to lots of Limbaugh and Hannity lately, have we?

 
At August 22, 2008 11:37 PM, Blogger Gimmer said...

I could just puke. I don't want to vote for either of these corporate prostitutes! I can hear it now its like Nascar sponsorship! -And now we have the Democratic Convention brought to you by Anheuser-Busch! -And now we have the Republican Convention brought to you by who else but Halliburton?! I could just puke! Super sized Hyper-Capitalism has made slaves of us all!

 
At August 23, 2008 12:47 AM, Blogger Gimmer said...

Struck a nerve did I you yellow anonymous one, posting on the 11th? Me thinks you are a Coastalcrat and did not like me hitting so close to home! Rush Limbaugh I have never listened to and never shall. My ideas are my own.

 
At August 23, 2008 3:59 PM, Blogger Gimmer said...

New York City has a high degree of income disparity. In 2005 the median household income in the wealthiest census tract was reported to be $188,697, while in the poorest it was $9,320.[15] The disparity is driven by wage growth in high income brackets, while wages have stagnated for middle and lower income brackets. In 2006 the average weekly wage in Manhattan was $1,453, the highest and fastest growing among the largest counties in the United States.[16] The borough is also experiencing a "baby boom" among the wealthy that is unique among U.S. cities. Since 2000, the number of children under age 5 living in Manhattan has grown by more than 32%

 
At August 24, 2008 8:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The last time I checked, New York City was still located on the East Coast, which would suggest that many of those on the poor end of the 'wealth disparity' spectrum would qualify as the laborers you seem to believe don't exist on the Coasts, Gimmer. If I'm a "Coastalcrat" (whatever the fuck that is--sounds like a Limbaughism to me), somebody forgot to clue me in, as I'm laboring for a lousy 29,000 a year (full-time work, may I add). Sounds a little more as if it were I who hit your retard nerve...and just because you claim not to listen to the FoxNews boys--well, tiny little minds can think alike just a much as great ones do; as your silly-ass initial post has just amply demonstrated.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home