Undernews is the online report of the Progressive Review, edited by Sam Smith, who has covered Washington during all or part of one quarter of America's presidencies and edited alternative journals since 1964. The Review has been on the web since 1995. See main page for full contents

April 24, 2009


Washington Times - President Obama's pick to head the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration raises a few red flags. . .

The nation's traffic-safety czar has broad powers to control the roads and road-going habits of Americans. [Chuck] Hurley has a history of pushing laws that harass millions of law-abiding citizens to ensnare a few lawbreakers. He supports returning the 55 mph speed limit to our highways as well as roadblocks and random pullovers to make sure drivers aren't doing anything wrong. This methodology is based on a presumption of guilt - not innocence - of the average driver who is doing nothing wrong.

Mr. Hurley has promoted a mania of overregulation at MADD. Absent from his advocacies is the principle that a punishment should fit the crime, or that a crime even needs to be committed to incur a penalty. Under this influence, MADD has been lobbying to lower the allowable blood-alcohol content for drivers to .04 - which means one glass of Pinot can land anyone behind bars. . .

As a result of MADD-fueled binges for tougher laws, extreme drunken driving punishments - such as loss of driving privileges, jail time, fines and legal fees beyond $10,000 - often apply to individuals who were not drunk and in some cases were not even driving. Last month, the Connecticut Supreme Court unanimously upheld a driving-under-the-influence conviction against a man who was sleeping off his bender in his car even though the keys were not in the ignition. In 2005, the North Carolina Court of Appeals upheld a DUI sentence for a tipsy man riding a motorized skateboard. The Georgia State Police charged a woman with drunken driving for riding a horse.

Such absurd cases will continue to proliferate as long as the breathalyzer machine is the sole determinant of guilt rather than evidence of unsafe conduct. Machines are prone to error, and basing guilt on a digital reading leaves little room for the specific facts of an individual situation. The same reliance on machines can be seen in Mr. Hurley's obsession with red-light and speed cameras. Mr. Hurley is a former board member of the National Campaign to Stop Red Light Running. The innocuous-sounding outfit frequently testifies at congressional hearings as if it were a nonprofit victim's advocacy group. In reality, it is a well-heeled lobbying shop for big business.

The so-called National Campaign's phone number - (202) 828-9100 - is answered by a receptionist at the public-relations firm Blakey and Agnew. Among that firm's big-ticket clients are the traffic-camera companies Redflex Traffic Systems of Australia, Gastometer BV of the Netherlands and Lasercraft Inc. of Britain. These foreign corporations all seek to rewrite state laws to allow machines to issue traffic-camera tickets, thus reaping huge profits for the companies that operate them - including Redflex, Gastometer and Lasercraft.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Again, you quote from such dubious sources--the Moonie Times??!!! Now I'm thinking you ARE serious, in which case I'd suggest you see a doctor to make sure your circulation to the brain is all right, a carotid ultrasound would be good. This may sound sarcastic, but I'm serious, I used to respect your opinions if not agree with them, I'm quite concerned, and not as a concern troll.

April 24, 2009 8:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

okay, I read further and you have better posts, maybe you are all right, I was worried.

April 24, 2009 8:50 PM  
Anonymous m said...

Recent investigations into the software of such machines demonstrates their reliability to be on the level of electronic voting machines. Zilch.

April 25, 2009 11:18 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home