UNDERNEWS

Undernews is the online report of the Progressive Review, edited by Sam Smith, who covered Washington during all or part of one quarter of America's presidencies and edited alternative journals since 1964. The Review has been on the web since 1995. See main page for full contents

July 21, 2009

PALIN ONLY SIX POINTS BEHIND OBAMA IN MATCHUP

Rasmussen - If the 2012 presidential election were held today, President Obama and possible Republican nominee Mitt Romney would be all tied up at 45% each, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. The president, seeking a second four-year term, beats another potential GOP rival, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, by six points: 48% to 42. . .

Palin is second only to Romney as the presidential candidate Republican voters say right now that they'll vote for in 2012 state GOP primaries. But she's also one of two candidates they least hope wins the party's nomination. . .

Men prefer the Republican over Obama whether it's Romney or Palin, while women like the president better in both match-ups. Palin continues to fare more poorly among women than her male rivals.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Mairead said...

This shouldn't be a surprise. Obummer sold what he had no intention of delivering, and is now proving that he's just another oreo. Only the rabidly partisan and the terminally hard-of-thinking would vote for him again.

July 21, 2009 7:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Only a complete idiot would vote for Palin for any office against anybody. Even Dan Quayle would be better. This survey certainly shows how stupid the average American is.

July 21, 2009 12:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama has supported and continued every one of W's abysmal policies. With the corporate twin parties in power, it matters not which figurehead sleeps in Jefferson's bed.

July 21, 2009 1:12 PM  
Anonymous sorry said...

I should have said,"soils Jefferson's bed".

July 21, 2009 1:14 PM  
Anonymous wellbasically said...

Obama is already too liberal for his election. If he was more aggressive he'd be losing to Mark Sanford.

Obama won because he got the independents on Iraq. The realignment towards the Democrats is an illusion.

July 22, 2009 1:33 PM  
Blogger robbie said...

well, basically, I agree with wellbasically...Obama barely won, really. I know pundits and Warshington insiders like to think that a few percentage points is a massive win, but the only real landlsides are in highly Rep or Dem districts. The Democrats in Congress hardly hold a solid lead. Everything could change in '10.

July 22, 2009 11:07 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home