GET FREE E-MAIL UPDATES: SEND US YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS WITH SUBSCRIBE IN THE SUBJECT LINE
or subscribe to our
Twitter service

UNDERNEWS

Undernews is the online report of the Progressive Review, edited by Sam Smith, who covered Washington during all or part of ten of America's presidencies and who has edited alternative journals since 1964. The Review, which has been on the web since 1995, is now published from Freeport, Maine. See main page for full contents

November 24, 2009

CONVENTIONAL MEDIA HIDES TRUTH ABOUT PUBLIC OPTION

James Ridgeway, Unsilent Generation - Trudy Lieberman of the Columbia Journalism Review, among the few writers to find her way through the blizzard of misleading press accounts on [public option], has done an interview with Oregon's Senator Ron Wyden that includes his own takedown of the current public option. Here is what Wyden says:

"The House public option would cover six million people and the Senate three to four million - roughly one out of eight people. United Healthcare has seventy million policyholders. Why haven't the American people been told that under ten million would be eligible? How can six million people hold United Healthcare accountable? You never see the press writing how virtually nobody would be eligible. . . I think people will be flabbergasted by the idea that the typical person is going to be virtually defenseless against the insurance companies."

The battle over the public option Wyden says, has become a meaningless political exercise, promoted by the media's inadequate coverage of health care reform. "It's all about the horserace and a lot of the rest is about personalities. . . [The press's] idea is liberals for and conservatives against. It's the clash on Capitol Hill over the public option. The public hasn't been informed."

Wyden thinks this pitched battle has distracted attention from the real issue, which is that for the "typical consumer," health reform will change things "very little." He believes that even if a reform bill is passed, millions of people will still not be able to afford decent insurance - with or without a public option, and with or without the proposed federal subsidies. This is because lawmakers are unwilling to seriously regulate the costs incurred by insurance companies and the rest of the profit-driven health care industry. So the entire "reform' is ending up as a subsidy to the insurance industry.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home