GET FREE E-MAIL UPDATES: SEND US YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS WITH SUBSCRIBE IN THE SUBJECT LINE
or subscribe to our
Twitter service

UNDERNEWS

Undernews is the online report of the Progressive Review, edited by Sam Smith, who covered Washington during all or part of ten of America's presidencies and who has edited alternative journals since 1964. The Review, which has been on the web since 1995, is now published from Freeport, Maine. We get over 5 million article visits a year. See prorev.com for full contents of our site

January 22, 2010

A SOLUTION TO THE CORPORATE TAKEOVER OF POLITICS: FREE TV ADS


Michael Wolfe, Newser - Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling effectively means American corporations are free to spend as much money as they wanna spend to elect whomever they want. . .

But I have the solution. It's been obvious since the earliest days of television. In fact, the problem with the electoral system isn't money, it's television.

The overwhelming share of campaign money is spent on TV media time. Therefore, if you eliminate the cost of that media, the problem of disproportionate free speech is solved. . .

It would have been easy enough for Congress or the FCC to have mandated free advertising time for political messages. Every candidate, qualified in some more or less reasonable way, gets an equal amount of media time. Why not? Broadcasters would have lost money for sure, but, media being of intangible value, this giveaway would not have cost them money (what's more, this is, after all, the public's air time, or, in the case of cable, the public's franchise). How could this not have been an obvious and ideal solution for everybody but the television business?

Of course, some richies and their corporate allies might always buy more media on top of their allotted time, as Mayor Bloomberg surely would. But if the basic allotment is large enough, the law of diminishing returns kicks in. Also, everybody gets a fair chance to make their case and to raise more money on the basis of their message-rather than to raise more money on the basis of already having raised money.

Everything changes under this system. Politics now is primarily about raising money (or begging for it), but with media bills covered, financing a campaign becomes an ancillary task. The beleaguered and the cynical and those temperamentally disinclined to beg will be more apt to participate in the system. What's more, with television widely accessible, the quality of the message becomes more significant than the ubiquity.


1 Comments:

Anonymous robbie said...

BZZZT! Sorry! We're a capitalism-loving country! Free TV? Are you a commanist??

January 24, 2010 12:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home