|
AMERICA
2.0
WHERE
IS THE COUNTERCULTURE WHEN WE NEED IT?
THINGS
TO DO IN THE BAD TIMES
SAM
SMITH TALKS TO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS about
politics and activism
PUNK
AND PROTEST: Music and
action
HAT
TRICK An existential
approach to the current crisis.
RUNNING
OUT OF CHANGE: Why
it's so hard to make good things happen
DESPAIR Dealing
with failure and survival
A
COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH:
Some things we could share
REBELLION'S
ROLE
CIVIL
LIBERTIES
OF
PINK SUITS, GOLF BALLS & CIVIL LIBERTIES - A talk to an upper school
assembly
FASCISM
CLUES
YOUR COUNTRY MAY BE TURNING INTO A FASCIST STATE
NOTES
ON FASCISM
HISTORY
BUCKING THE SYSTEM: A chart that provides a
concise crash course on how Americans have won and kept their
freedoms.
WHERE
DID ALL THE COOL PREACHERS GO?
PEACE
PEACE
NEWS
THE ROLE OF RESPECT IN PEACE
BACKING OFF OF HATE
POLITICS
WHAT
IF DEMOCRATS ACTED LIKE DEMOCRATS?
HISTORY'S
HINTS FOR DEMOCRATS
HISTORY'S
HINTS FOR THIRD PARTIES
RAFTING
DOWN THE MAINSTREAM
THE
NON-POLITICAL SIDE OF POLITICS
THE
EXTREMIST CENTER
CROSSOVER
POLITICS: A
chart that illustrates why conventional views of left and right
don't add up.
BRINGING
POLITICS HOME: An excerpt from Shadows
of Hope on how politics has lost connection with people
TOOLS
198
METHODS OF NON-VIOLENT ACTION
MEETUPS
FREEWAY
BANNERS
STUDY CIRCLES
Too long have the
workers of the world waited for some Moses to lead them out of
bondage. He has not come; he never will come. I would not lead
you out if I could for if you could be led out, you could be
led back again. -- Eugene V. Debs
Nobody made a greater
mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little.
-- Edmund Burke
What you do is of
little significance. But it is very important that you do it
- Gandhi
Activism is my rent
for living on this planet - Alice Walker

BOOKS
HOW INTERNET RADIO CAN CHANGE THE WORLD:
AN ACTIVIST'S HANDBOOK
BUILDING POWERFUL COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: A Personal Guide to Creating Groups
That Can Solve Problems and Change the World, by Michael Jacoby
Brown, Long Haul Press, $19.95.
CALLING ALL RADICALS: How Grassroots Organizers Can Save Our
Democracy, by Gabriel Thompson, Nation Books, $14.95.
TOOLS FOR RADICAL DEMOCRACY:
How to Organize for Power in Your Community, by Joan Minieri
and Paul Getsos, Chardon Press, $29.95. |
MAY 2008
HOW TO GET A POLICE CHIEF TO BACK
OFF SNEAKY, ILLEGAL SEARCHES
DC's police chief Kathy
Lanier came up with a plan to get people to allow officers to
search their homes for any object by granting them immunity only
from the city' gun law. The local
ACLU, led by Johnny Barnes, got on the case with a door to
door information campaign that soon turned into a neighborhood
march. With this sort of protest, Chief Lanier soon backed off
of her sneaky search scheme.
APRIL 2008
HOW MEXICAN ACTIVISTS USE BLOCKADES
FEBRUARY 2008
PRAIRIE VIEW A&M STUDENTS
TAKE ON THE GOP
RURAL VOTES
- Texas Republicans have
worked overtime to make it harder for key Democratic voting groups
to vote and be represented fairly. For the Prairie View A&M
University precincts, they put the early-polling place more than
seven miles from the school. So what did the students do? They
shut down the highway as they marched seven miles to cast their
votes on the first day of early voting.
JANUARY 2008
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CONCEALED
PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT RESTRICTING PROTESTS ON THE MALL; PAST USERS
NOT NOTIFIED
ANSWER COALITION - At
a public meeting called by the National Park Service in Washington,
D.C., representatives from the Partnership for Civil Justice,
ANSWER Coalition, Nicaragua Network, Grassroots America, ImpeachBush.org
and others demanded that there be no new restrictions placed
on the right of the people to access the National Mall for free
speech activities.
The National Park Service
is undertaking an plan similar to that launched to exclude protests
from New York City's Great Lawn. It will be used to further restrict
or ban protest on the Mall from current levels. This is part
of a nationwide campaign of corporate-sponsored organizations
working in partnership with government entities that claim that
protests, rallies and demonstrations harm grass, green space
or natural resources and must therefore be restricted or banned
or shunted off to designated protest pits. The National Mall
has been used for decades as the site for mass assembly protest
and gatherings.
A lawsuit filed by the
Partnership for Civil Justice on behalf of the National Council
of Arab Americans and the ANSWER Coalition successfully overturned
regulations in New York City that were used to prevent mass assembly
protest in the Great Lawn of Central Park during the Republican
National Convention
The NPS has set up a "public-private"
partnership that allows business interests and real estate developers
-- in coordination with the government -- to determine the future
of the National Mall. The Jan. 12 public meeting was intended
to have low attendance to allow the government to claim public
involvement while simultaneously excluding it. When confronted
with the fact that they had done no legitimate outreach about
the public meeting to the hundreds of thousands of people who
have actually used the National Mall, the President of the Trust
for the National Mall responded that she had sent notice to the
Board of Trade. The NPS issues 3,000 permits a year for the use
of the National Mall, but there has been no effort to notify
any of those organizations about the proposed changes.
TO WRITE THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
OCTOBER 2007
GREAT MOMENTS IN ACTIVISM:
THE BLUE TAPE SCREED
BOOKSHELF: BUILDING NEW COMMUNITY
BUILDING POWERFUL COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: A Personal Guide to Creating Groups
That Can Solve Problems and Change the World, by Michael Jacoby
Brown, Long Haul Press, $19.95.
CALLING ALL RADICALS: How Grassroots Organizers Can Save Our
Democracy, by Gabriel Thompson, Nation Books, $14.95.
TOOLS FOR RADICAL DEMOCRACY:
How to Organize for Power in Your Community, by Joan Minieri
and Paul Getsos, Chardon Press, $29.95.
BENNETT BAUMER, CITY LIMITS Three recent books serve as guides to
organizers building community groups, unions and other social
change organizations. Two of these works could be characterized
as textbooks "Tools For Radical Democracy,"
by Joan Minieri and Paul Getsos, and "Building Powerful
Community Organizations," by Michael Jacoby Brown. "Calling
All Radicals," by Gabriel Thompson, gives helpful tips on
organizing while maintaining a more anecdotal narrative flow.
. . "Tools For Radical Democracy" and "Building
Powerful Community Organizations" are the most explicit
about how to build organizations for social change. . . . Both
books offer various case studies, rooted in Getsos' coalition-building
in uptown Manhattan and Jacoby Brown's decades' worth of agitating
around workplace issues across the country. The textbooks also
offer exercises and work sheets at the ends of chapters on such
mundane organizing work as phone banking, door knocking, media
relations and preparing testimony to elected officials. . . While
the above books are basically practical manuals, Thompson's "Calling
All Radicals" is more directed at the heart. As a former
housing organizer in central Brooklyn, Thompson believes organizers
are the key to building democracy and illuminates how they do
the grunt work. Thompson presents tenants standing up to slumlords,
and politicians reluctant to enact a tough lead paint bill, not
as case studies but as part of a social justice story. . . "Calling
All Radicals" also examines Alinsky's organizing model and
asks the provocative question why do organizers do what
they do, and to what end?
JANUARY 2007
A LETTER TO THOMAS JEFFERSON
[We recently came across this while rummaging through our files.
It was written by Edward Schwartz of the Institute for the Study
of Civic Values for Social Policy in 1974]
Mr. Thomas Jefferson
Continental Congress
Independence Hall
Philadelphia, Pa.
Dear Mr. Jefferson:
We have read your "Declaration of Independence" with
great interest. Certainly, it represents a considerable undertaking,
and many of your statements do merit serious consideration. Unfortunately,
the Declaration as a whole fails to meet recently adopted specifications
for proposals to the Crown, so we must return the document to
you for further refinement. The questions which follow might
assist you in your process of revision.
1. In your opening paragraph you use the phrase "the Laws
of Nature and Nature's God." What are these laws? In what
way are they the criteria on which you base your central arguments?
Please document with citations from the recent literature.
2. In the same paragraph you refer to the "opinions of mankind."
Whose polling data are you using? Without specific evidence,
it seems to us, the "opinions of mankind" are a matter
of opinion.
3. You hold certain truths to be "self-evident." Could
you please elaborate. If they are as evident as you claim, then
it should not be difficult for you to locate the appropriate
supporting statistics.
4. "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" seem
to be the goals of your proposal. These are not measurable goals.
If you were to say that "among these is the ability to sustain
an average life expectancy in six of the 13 colonies of at least
55 years, and to enable all newspapers in the colonies to print
news without outside interference, and to raise the average income
of the colonists by 10 percent in the next 10 years," these
would be measurable goals. Please clarify.
5. You state that "whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter
or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government. ..."
Have you weighed this assertion against all the alternatives?
Or is it predicated solely on the baser instincts?
6. Your description of the existing situation is quite extensive.
Such a long list of grievances should precede the statement of
goals, not follow it.
7. Your strategy for achieving your goal is not developed at
all. You state that the colonies "ought to be Free and Independent
States," and that they are "Absolved from All Allegiance
to the British Crown." Who or what must change to achieve
this objective? In what way must they change? What resistance
must you overcome to achieve the change? What specific steps
will you take to overcome the resistance? How long will it take?
We have found that a little foresight in these areas helps to
prevent careless errors later on.
8. Who among the list of signatories will be responsible for
implementing your strategy? Who conceived it? Who provided the
theoretical research? Who will constitute the advisory committee?
Please submit an organization chart.
9. You must include an evaluation design. We have been requiring
this since Queen Anne's War.
10. What impact will your program have? Your failure to include
any assessment of this inspires little confidence in the long-range
prospects of your undertaking.
11. Please submit a PERT diagram, an activity chart, and an itemized
budget.
We hope that these comments prove useful in revising your "Declaration
of Independence."
Best Wishes,
Lord North
NOVEMBER 2006
MOTHERS FIGHT LACTOSE INTOLERANCE WITH
A NURSE-IN
MSNBC - Babies at the breast,
protest signs close by, nursing mothers staged "nurse-in"
demonstrations in airports across the country Tuesday, rallying
behind a woman ordered off a plane for breast-feeding her daughter
too openly. "I truly hope it does get the message across,"
said Becky Fontana, 29, nursing her four-month-old daughter as
she sat cross-legged on the terminal floor at Burlington [VT]
International Airport.
About 25 women turned out here,
parking themselves near a Delta Air Lines ticket counter in a
peaceful - but not-so-quiet - demonstration mirroring those in
airports in Boston, Columbus, Nashville, Tenn., Harrisburg, Pa.,
Hartford, Conn., Albuquerque, N.M., Louisville, Ky. and elsewhere.
In all, more than two dozen demonstrations were planned. Story
continues below ? advertisement. Some of the women carried hand-lettered
signs saying "Don't be lactose intolerant" and "Breasts
- Not just for selling cars anymore.". . .
On Oct. 13, Emily Gillette, 27,
of Santa Fe, N.M., was ordered off a Freedom Airlines flight
about to take off from Burlington International Airport after
a flight attendant asked her to cover up while she was breast-feeding
her 1-year-old daughter.
She had been sitting on the New
York-bound plane - which was three hours late departing - when
she began nursing, prompting the flight attendance to hand her
a blanket. When she refused it, the female flight attendant had
her removed from the plane, along with her husband and child.
The airline later disciplined
the unidentified worker. . .
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15833953/
GOOD DAYS FOR LESSER SEATTLE
SAM HOWE VERHOVEK, LA TIMES - For believers in a Lesser Seattle, it's
been a fantastic month. First, Seattle voters said a resounding
"no" to spending public money on a new professional
basketball arena, all but begging the NBA Supersonics to leave
town. Strong opposition has also emerged to the mayor's plans
for a Big Dig-style tunnel project along the waterfront. And,
in a capstone, the National Weather Service announced last week
that November, far from over, was already the rainiest month
here in nearly 75 years.
Wonderful, from the Lesser Seattle
point of view. Let the word go out. Who'd ever want to live here?
"Lesser Seattle" was
a term coined in the 1980s by late newspaper columnist Emmett
Watson, as a puckish play on Greater Seattle Inc, the name of
an early group of tourism and growth promoters. It never became
a formal organization, but Lesser Seattle is nonetheless a powerful
and enduring state of mind. . .
Plenty of people welcome growth
and development. But plenty say Seattle has given up too much
of its blue-collar soul in the process. "Part of our civic
makeup is this idea that being too big for your britches is a
bad thing," says Knute Berger, former editor of the Seattle
Weekly newspaper. "In that sense, Lesser Seattle is due
for a resurgence."
Al Runte, a former University
of Washington history professor and former mayoral candidate,
says he detects an "enough is enough" sentiment among
voters in their passage, by nearly 75%, of the initiative barring
public funds for a new basketball arena.
"A city of this quality
does not need to give incentives to developers," he says.
"They should be paying taxpayers for the privilege of being
in this city.". . .
AUGUST 2006
CANVASSING FOR GOOD CAUSES MAY
BE LOSING THE LEFT SOME GOOD ACTIVISTS
GREG BLOOM, IN THESE TIMES - There's
a word that gets tossed around in canvassing offices to describe
people like Christian Miller: "scrappy." That's not
because of his skinny frame and sparse, wiry chin-scrabble. Rather,
in an industry where the average career lasts two weeks, Miller,
28, canvassed door-to-door throughout Los Angeles for four years.
In the last 30 years, canvassers
like Miller have become the most common-if unsung-figures in
political activism, going door-to-door or standing on busy street
corners to talk to people about various public interest issues.
It took Miller a minute to tick through the long list of campaigns
for which he'd raised money: solar energy bills, forest protection,
Sierra Club, Human Rights Campaign. All were operated by the
same company: the Fund for Public Interest Research (commonly
known as "the Fund"), a national nonprofit founded
by the Public Interest Research Groups in 1982. Since then, canvassers
for the now-ubiquitous state PIRGs have raised over $350 million
and gathered more than 20 million signatures for causes ranging
from environmental protection to gay rights. The Fund holds a
near-monopoly on the canvass industry, running 30 to 60 offices
each summer, with thousands of canvassers working on dozens of
campaigns. . .
Dana Fisher, a sociology professor
at Columbia University, . . . interviewed hundreds of canvassers
over a period of several years, with the permission of an organization
that in her work goes under the pseudonym, "the People's
Project." This organization is acknowledged to be one of
the largest canvassing organizations in the United States.
Fisher found that canvassing experience
severely limits the entry points for young people looking for
a career in social justice. According to Fisher, the canvass
industry yields a remarkably "small percentage [of canvassers
who find] other work in politics after canvassing." Far
more often these young people go to the private sector. (This
summer, Miller took a job with a solar panel installation company.)
Activism, Inc. suggests that rather than a breeding ground for
new generations of grassroots activism, the industry is eating
the left's young.
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2787/
APRIL 2006
CORPORATIZING NON-PROFITS
[We've seen a number of non-profits
lose their way as they have dumped creative and mission-related
members of a board in favor of business types and fundraisers,
as well as trying to imitate corporations while purportedly carrying
out a social or cultural purpose. The price of this can be seen
at the Smithsonian on down and contributes to America's cultural
entropy. But the Boston Business Journal thinks it's just fine]
BOSTON BUSINESS JOURNAL - Throughout
Boston's arts community, board members [from corporations] are
helping small and midsize organizations get to the next level
-- and to the next level after that. Basile is one of 107 professionals
who went through the Arts & Business Council of Greater Boston's
"Business on Board" program, a comprehensive program
that trains and places business executives on the boards of local
arts and cultural organizations. Once executives complete the
program, Celeste Wilson, the council's executive director, matches
trainees with an organization.
Leaders in the arts community
say graduates of the program have been a boon for arts and cultural
organizations that are competing for a smaller pool of funds.
"We're running more like a business," says Susan Gassett,
the artistic director, secretary and founder of City Stage Co.,
a nonprofit that brings children's theater to institutions including
schools and hospitals. . . "They're wonderful," says
Gassett, who oversees an operating budget of $275,000 and two
full-time employees. "They really jumped right in and are
very active and thoughtful. They tell me what to do. I like that."
http://boston.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2006/04/24/story2.html?page=2
JUNE 2006
PHOTO BY CAMARONN
CHILDREN REVOLT IN CHILE
GUARDIAN - Using the internet and
cell phones, the students have rewritten the rules of dissent
with their ability instantly to organize marches and make collective
decisions. The organizers are very young, with an average age
of 16, and their support goes all the way down to 11-year-olds,
who organize forums and debate the right to a free education,
turning their break into a civics lesson.
THE 25 YEAR PROTEST:
LONGEST VIGIL ANYWHERE
MAY 2006
THE OUTHOUSES OF UNGER
People in Unger, West Virginia,
are organizing to try and stop the proposed subdivision in our
tiny community. We are pleased to announce the creation of a
citizens group to oppose high density subdivisions. The name
we have chosen is Outhouses of Unger. We chose that name for
two simple reasons. The first is that the outhouse is a symbol
of Morgan County and West Virginia's proud rural heritage. The
goal of our group is to keep Morgan County rural. Second is that
those of us that live near this development are scared to death
that our wells will go dry from the construction of that many
homes in such a small area. Our motto is "If Your Well Goes
Dry, You'll Need One Of These".
We are asking all people that
live in the Unger area or along Winchester Grade Road to construct
an outhouse on their property as a sign of support against the
type of high density developemt being built in our community.
These will be just temporary structures as a symbolic First Amendment
protest. Materials and labor will be supplied by volunteers if
you need help.
http://www.outhousesofunger.com/
25 YEARS OF WHISTLEBLOWING
THE PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT
is celebrating 25 years of exposing federal misconduct and corruption.
Founded in 1981 as the Project on Military Procurement, POGO
exposed malfunctions in military equipment that cost taxpayers
tens of millions of dollars, pushed for the U.S. to be able to
recover millions more in fines and unpaid royalties, and advocated
before Congress for strong whistleblower protection laws and
a more open government. Here are a few of Pogo's hits:
1981 POGO exposes first operational
test failures of the M-1 tank and challenges the effectiveness
of several weapons, including Air Force AWACS and terrain-guided
cruise missiles.
1984 The Project exposes such
purchases by the Department of Defense such as the infamous $7,600
coffee makers and $436 hammers.
1987 The Project helps defend
Air Force whistleblower A. Ernest Fitzgerald's assertion of his
First Amendment rights when he refuses to sign a government-wide
gag order.
1991 A major government contractor,
SAIC, receives the highest fine to date for environmental cleanup
fraud after POGO helps expose the contractor's efforts to use
its political connections with the Justice Department to escape
prosecution.
1993 POGO is credited with the
cancellation of the wasteful $11 billion Superconducting Supercollider
project, at that time the largest government program ever cancelled.
1996 POGO-generated media attention
forces Department of Interior to bill the oil industry for $385
million in unpaid royalties.
1998 POGO wins its second victory
defending the False Claims Act after a POGO report shows the
act helped recover $2 billion from health care fraud cases.
2001 Oil companies pay total
of $440 million for fraudulently drilling on public lands - money
goes to public education, and land and water conservation funds.
Department of Interior also begins to collect $70 million more
annually from oil companies drilling on federal, state, and Native
American lands after POGO advocates for companies to pay fair
market share.
2004 Department of Energy Secretary
Spencer Abraham announces increased security standards for nuclear
materials based on POGO's recommendations.
2005 POGO wins lawsuit against
Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Department of Justice
for illegally retroactively classifying information critical
of the FBI.
http://www.pogo.org
[Your editor is a former board
member of POGO]
APRIL 2005
TINY CAMERAS ALLOW THE WATCHED
TO WATCH THE WATCHERS
PAUL ANDREWS, SEATTLE TIMES - With cameras getting smaller and cheaper
all the time, and showing up on everything from cellphones to
lapel pins, round-the-clock surveillance is becoming available
to average citizens. As much as some may recoil against the thought,
experts headlining a four-day conference in Seattle said yesterday
putting one's own life on record could prove the best defense
against growing government and corporate incursions into privacy.
Speaking at the Association for
Computing Machinery's Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference,
Steve Mann termed the process "sousveillance" - pronounced
soo-veillance and roughly French for "to watch from below"
- in contrast to surveillance, or to watch from above. In general,
the term refers to using a wearable or portable video camera
to record your every action.
Using sousveillance, conference
panelists said, police-brutality victims or protesters at a rally
would be able to record illegal actions taken against them by
police.
With a wireless camera and connection,
the images could be transmitted in real time over the Internet,
a protection in case police moved to seize or destroy the equipment,
said Mann, a University of Toronto professor who has pioneered
use of wearable computing devices, including cameras and digital
eyeglasses.
FEBRUARY 2005
HOWARD ZINN: WHAT CAN I DO?
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/021205Y.shtml
HOWARD ZINN, THE PROGRESSIVE
- What does it take to bring a turnaround in social consciousness
- from being a racist to being in favor of racial equality, from
being in favor of Bush's tax program to being against it, from
being in favor of the war in Iraq to being against it? We desperately
want an answer, because we know that the future of the human
race depends on a radical change in social consciousness.
It seems to me that we need not
engage in some fancy psychological experiment to learn the answer,
but rather to look at ourselves and to talk to our friends. We
then see, though it is unsettling, that we were not born critical
of existing society. There was a moment in our lives (or a month,
or a year) when certain facts appeared before us, startled us,
and then caused us to question beliefs that were strongly fixed
in our consciousness - embedded there by years of family prejudices,
orthodox schooling, imbibing of newspapers, radio, and television.
This would seem to lead to a
simple conclusion: that we all have an enormous responsibility
to bring to the attention of others information they do not have,
which has the potential of causing them to rethink long-held
ideas. It is so simple a thought that it is easily overlooked
as we search, desperate in the face of war and apparently immovable
power in ruthless hands, for some magical formula, some secret
strategy to bring peace and justice to the land and to the world.
"What can I do?" The
question is thrust at me again and again as if I possessed some
mysterious solution unknown to others. The odd thing is that
the question may be posed by someone sitting in an audience of
a thousand people, whose very presence there is an instance of
information being imparted which, if passed on, could have dramatic
consequences. The answer then is as obvious and profound as the
Buddhist mantra that says: "Look for the truth exactly on
the spot where you stand."
BELATED BHUTAN UPDATE
[NEWS
of February's first international conference on gross national
happiness has only just reached us from Bhutan.]
GOPILAL
ACHARYA - The first major international seminar which drew more
than 80 participants from across the globe to discuss the depth
and profundity of the concept of Gross National Happiness agreed
that GNH combines spirituality with secular science of technology
and that the global community should protect and enhance it.
Senior
professors, research fellows, journalists, lawyers, medical professionals,
Buddhist monks, managers, environmentalists, economists, social
activists, financiers, and academicians made 15-minute oral presentations
of about 45 papers during the seminar from February 18 -20 which
was attended by more than 300 people, mostly young students,
graduates and civil servants. The presentations were cablecast
in two separate rooms for people who could not fit in the main
hall.
"Although
the concept of GNH was first pronounced by His Majesty the King
in his speeches soon after acceding to the throne in 1972, it
was, however, only in the last two decades that the concept was
formally incorporated as a guiding principle in development policies
and plans," said the president of the Centre for Bhutan
Studies and prime minister Lyonpo Jigmi Y Thinley inaugurating
the seminar.
"While
conventional development models stress economic growth as the
ultimate objective, the concept of GNH is based on the premise
that true development of human society takes place when material
and spiritual development occur side by side to complement and
reinforce each other," he said.
"The
four pillars of GNH are the promotion of equitable and sustainable
socio-economic development, preservation and promotion of cultural
values, conservation of the natural environment, and establishment
of good governance.". . .
Comparing
GNH to the western conservative, liberal and socialist ideologies,
Professor [Mark] Mancall said that GNH is an ideology, a program
of social and economic change and development. "If GNH is
an ideology, the Bhutanese State is and must be the 'subject,'
the primary actor in the program of change that we call GNH,"
said the Professor.
Some papers
persuaded on why Bhutan should be cautious in joining WTO and
hinted that the unchecked onslaught of globalization could choke
the concept of GNH. Others argued that GNH revived the forgotten
element of Adam Smith school of thought, 'compassion' as an intricate
element of market economy.
Still
others said that happiness is primarily subjective and usually
confined to an individual.
A paper
by Dr Prabhat Pankaj and Tshering Dorji, lecturers at Sherubtse
college in Kanglung presented their findings of the field survey
of 612 individuals which used econometric technique to measure
happiness. "Our study found out that the rural people are
slightly happier than the urban ones and that cultural participation
and identity have emerged as the strongest variable influencing
happiness both in rural and urban areas," said Dr Pankaj.
"We also found that religious people tend to happier."
His Highness
the Crown Prince Dasho Khesar Namgyal Wangchuck, who graced the
closing of the seminar, said that even if the philosophy of GNH
is inherently Bhutanese, its ideas may have a positive relevance
to any nation, community or peoples.
"I
feel that there must be some convergence among nations on the
idea of what the primary objective of development and progress
should be - something that GNH seeks to bring about," he
said. "There cannot be enduring peace, prosperity, equality
and brotherhood in this world if our aims are so separate and
divergent especially as the world shrinks to a global village."
FEBRUARY 2004
90% OF NON-PROFITS REPORT FISCAL
STRESS, BUT FIND WAYS OF COPING
U.S. non-profit organizations
experienced significant fiscal stress over the past year, but
still managed to increase services and boost revenue, according
to a new report by the Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society
Studies. . .
Nearly 90 percent of the
surveyed organizations reported some degree of fiscal stress
over the past year, and more than half described that stress
as "severe." Yet the vast majority of these agencies
managed to boost their income, and nearly two-thirds reported
increased activity in response to growing demand
Four out of five respondents
reported expanded private fund-raising efforts and nearly 84
percent reported increased marketing and fees.
More agencies reported
expanding programs, broadening their reach and speeding up innovations
than reported cutting back in these areas.
Over half reported freezing
salaries, decreasing benefits or increasing staff hours. More
than 70 percent reported postponing hiring, eliminating vacancies,
or increasing reliance on part-time staff.
Over half of the respondents
reported dipping into reserves and endowments, selling real estate
or other assets, and/or borrowing in the hope of future gains.
Over half cited new collaborations
with other organizations.
Two thirds reported implementing
or expanding their advocacy activities.
NOVEMBER 2003
ROCK AND REBEL
[From Hungarian Ambassador
Andras Simonyi's speech at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in
Cleveland on November 8]
ANDRAS SIMONYI - I was
four when Russians tanks rolled down the streets of Budapest.
. . I was just a kid and I didn't really understand what was
happening. But it did leave a strong mark in my mind. I must
say that I had a great family - a great father, mother, a brother
and a sister, who helped preserve a life for me. That was pretty
much like yours; they were very protective. This family took
me to Denmark in 1960 where my father was trade representative,
I had the luck to go to an American school - that's probably
why I picked up some English and Danish, and I had the honor
to just live the ordinary life of an ordinary guy on the streets
of Copenhagen. . .
While I was in Denmark,
particularly in '66 and '67, like the Danes embraced the rock
music at its best, like the Danes got to know Cream, Jimmy Hendrix,
Zappa, Jefferson Airplane, Janis Joplin and you name it, I got
to know them as well. I was listening to this kind of music day
and night. I didn't know what the underlying message was and
I didn't care. I just thought this was something that I had to
embrace.
In 1965, I bought with
the help of my father my first guitar. . . It was a great guitar,
it's a copy of a Fender Jaguar. I had a great time until in '67
we moved back to Budapest. Budapest at that time was not a very
funny place. It was a pretty tough, dark, and gloomy place. It
was just ten years after the 1956 revolution which was broken
by the Soviets. Still, society was quietly and slowly coming
alive. But it was a very tough place to be, especially for me
who'd got used to freedom - freedom in the way I dressed, freedom
in the way I communicated, freedom in the way I talked to people,
and freedom in the way I picked up my music.
The music that I thought
so much of was simply not available in Hungary. I stayed a year
with an aunt and uncle of mine who turned out to be a very conservative
communist. And honestly, they didn't get it when I started to
explain about Good Vibrations and the Four Tops and the Spencer
Davis group. She didn't understand. And my brother and I, we
had a big old Bakelite radio that I got from my father so we
could listen to Western radio stations and we used to listen
to that at night. Listening to that music at night was very important
to us to keep track of what was going on in the West. One night
as we were listening to some real nice stuff, the old man came
in, very angry, and took away the radio. Next day we asked for
an audience and we said "Sorry for having listened to this
music so loud," and he said "The problem was not that
it was loud. The problem was that you were listening to a Western
radio station." That was something that really hurt us -
I was 14 and my brother was 16 - being told you're not allowed
to listen to music on a Western radio station that we always
used to listen to. That was real tough. And we got to understand
very quickly that this Hungary is not very similar to the Denmark
where we used to live.
Still, you had to keep
going and it was so important for me, my continuing to keep in
touch with the music scene in the West. It kept us sane and kind
of made us part of the free world. We would listen to Radio Free
Europe, Voice of America, and above all, to Radio Luxemburg.
We used to listen to this stuff at night and as we listened to
this radio, as we listened to Radio Luxemburg, we were suddenly
out of our bodies and our soul was part of the free world. We
would join our peers in the West. We would be part of the scene
that was so natural for all of you here in the United States
or in England or Denmark or Holland or elsewhere in the free
world.
As I returned to Hungary,
I was a good student. I don't know if I was smart but I always
had good grades and that was in order to get things out the way
so I could do my music. I did a lot of practicing, formed my
own band, and got in touch with the Hungarian music scene which,
strangely enough, started to grow immediately after the rock
explosion in the West. The instruments were lousy, so I was a
cool guy, I had great instruments. Instruments in general were
no good but some guys somehow managed to get great instruments
and they produced some good sound. And it was so good to be a
part of this. That's where I met my old-time very best friend,
Gabor Presser, who was my mentor, was my great friend - he's
still my best friend, and he's still a great musician. . .
Of course, there was no
records to be had. Here, you heard Led Zeppelin on the radio,
the next day you walked into a record shop and bought it. In
Hungary, we couldn't do that. Therefore, when we got hold of
records, it was so much valuable. It was much more meaningful
to us - it was not just something to consume, to buy. It wasn't
just owning it; it was way beyond that. No one Hungarian had
all the records, but somehow Hungarians together managed to get
all the records. We would copy these records. I hope the copyright
guys don't listen now because, honestly, whatever the reason,
they would have clamped down on the Hungarians copying this stuff.
But we would walk into this record store that would make one
single copy of a record and sell it to us. We would tape it and
then spread it five hundred times. That was kind of nice. That
was really important to us. One way or another, we were very
much part of the scene. . .
I created my own band
and it was kind of a strange band. . . We used to play Cream
in '67, '68 and '69. I would do Rory Gallagher, I would do some
early Fleetwood Mac stuff. It was really very special because
I'd always thought this was at the avant-garde of rock music.
In 1969 however a band led by Stevie Winwood called Traffic,
which I loved so much, came to Budapest. I had no idea how they
got there and it was the strangest thing because I would know
all the Traffic tunes by heart, you name it and I could sing
it and I try to play it. "Mr. Fantasy" and "Medicated
Goo," or whatever. . .
With the help of my father,
I figured out where Traffic would be staying, which hotel, and
after the concert I'd hang out at the hotel and Stevie Winwood
shows up and it is like, I don't know, may I say it is like God
showing up? And I started talking to him and we had some words
and he said I'm sorry, I got to go, but I figured out that maybe
it would be a good idea that I act as a guide for the rest of
the group. So I took Jim Capaldi, the drummer, and Albert, the
road manager down to Lake Balaton - which, by the way, is a place
you've to got visit sometime - and we hung out for a couple of
days. I was very really into something very special, talking
to these people. That left a lasting mark on my attitude to music.
Here is what happened: A few weeks ago my guys came back and
said Stevie Winwood is playing in Washington this weekend. We
got hold of Stevie Winwood and I went down to see the concert,
a great concert. We started talking about what happened 35 years
ago. He said "Yes, I remember. I didn't go to the Lake with
you because I had to go and listen to some gipsy music."
And I said "Steve, how did you get [to Hungary]?" He
said "I don't know because we didn't go to any of the other
East European communist countries." "Can you give me
an explanation?" He said "Call Chris Blackwell."
So I called Chris Blackwell, who was then their manager and I
asked, "Chris, what the hell was Traffic doing in Hungary?"
He said, "Look, I think you had some opening in '68 because
no one else would take us in but Hungarians were crazy with this
music and somehow the authorities allowed this to happen."
I didn't know then, and
it didn't click, that was exactly the couple of years when the
system lightened up a little, culture lightened up a little,
economy lightened up a little, and of course Hungarians embraced
as much as they could from the free world in this short opening
which only lasted until 1972. But it was also something interesting
that I have to tell you, and it didn't click before I talked
to Steve Winwood: Hungarians didn't understand the text [of any
of the rock tunes]. And I just suddenly realized that it was
not the text but the power of music, the power of a couple of
guys standing on stage with a Stratocaster, with a Fender bass,
a guy playing on organ, a drummer playing a Gretsch drum set,
that really made Hungarians think this was something very important.
So while the authorities
tried to limit through the propaganda machinery the impact of
this on Hungarians and obviously also on other Central Eastern
Europeans, there was no way to stop the onslaught of the message
of freedom through rock and roll. That was the most powerful
instrument to convey the message to my generation about the free
world. I do believe today, what the satellite and VHS was for
the '80s and what the Internet is today, was rock and roll and
rock music in the '60s and the early '70s. It was about sending
a strong message of freedom through the Berlin Wall to us who
were living behind the Iron Curtain. . .
We wanted to make music
come as close to the best of the best in the free world as we
could. . . And the funny thing was - you should understand that
the lyrics were censored. We always had to scratch out something.
We always had to change the words. When we spoke about the freedom
of man or the freedom of the world, they would put something
foolish into the text. They didn't realize that the music itself
was more powerful than the text. They didn't realize that the
real power lay in the music. So therefore my fellow musicians,
those who came after us, they tried and expanded our little freedoms
as much as they could. Sometimes they would hurt us, sometimes
they wouldn't. Sometimes they would "understand" what
we were doing, sometimes not. . .
In 1972, I was going to
defect from Hungary. I said, this is not the world I want to
live in. I remember in 1972, I was standing in the railway station
in Copenhagen and I called my mother and I said "Mom, I
am not coming home." And she said "Son, okay, you're
not coming home, but then I and Dad and your brother and sister
will not be able to live the lives we want them to live."
So I went back. And frankly, I didn't regret it because in 1974
I met Nada, my wife. That was a big deal and I think I enchanted
her by starting to - I remember we were sitting in a bus and
I started explaining to her about the new George Harrison hit
"Bangladesh" and, you know, I described it to her from
all angles. I think I was successful because she changed a lot
through my convincing.
But I also want to tell
you that in the meanwhile there was a hardening of the system
and two guys from the band Locomotive GT defected to the United
States. The drummer [Jozsef (Joe) Laux], and my great friend
and hero the guitarist Tamas Barta. The saddest of all stories
is that Tamas arrived in the United States and figured out that
he will not be the great star that he used to be in Hungary and
he will not be able to make it here and he ended up being shot
in Los Angeles. It's a sad story but he really never was able
to leave Hungary spiritually. Wanted to embrace so much the free
world, the West. And this collision of the lack of freedom and
wanting to be a Hungarian led to his fate. I miss him still.
. .
In 1988. . . Amnesty International
was on a world tour, and that was the year when I knew the Wall
will be torn down and we will put an end to the Cold War and
Hungary will soon be free. Amnesty International was brought
to Hungary by Sting, Peter Gabriel, Tracy Chapman, and Bruce
Springsteen. Just imagine the powerful message of Bruce Springsteen
singing "Born in the USA" at the stadium in Budapest
and 80,000 Hungarian kids roaring and saying, yes, we're together.
That was the year when I was 100 percent convinced that [communism]
will be over soon. My friends in the West reacted in disbelief,
but I was right. What stronger message than the message that
came through rock music can you imagine?
In 1989, the world moved
on and Hungary was free again. You might wonder, what next? My
personal life, the music that I embraced all my life has played
an incredible role of since. I have a very easy rapport with
my friends and colleagues in the West, primarily in the United
States. I got to know friends who are working for the U.S. government
when we suddenly figured out that we were listening to the same
kind of music. I name one song, you name the band. That's how
I met your ambassador to Moscow [Alexander Vershbow], who used
to be my friend and colleague in NATO, and he used to be a rock
musician when he was a kid, still plays. And as we grew closer,
as Hungary started to move into NATO, the closer this friendship
grew. We jammed together and this really made our friendship
close. We both agree that this is something that has to continue
to glue us together.
I believe that rock music
is not imperial, not imperialistic. Mozart used to belong to
the Austrians. Does anyone ask anywhere in the world - in China,
in the United States, in Brazil, in Moscow - where Mozart came
from? You couldn't care less. The music that Traffic played,
that Cream played, that Jimmy Hendrix played, that "Skunk"
Baxter played belongs not to the United States or to the UK any
longer - it belongs all of us. . . Rock and roll music is universal;
it is a universal language. It's easy to embrace. It speaks to
the people. That is why it was so useful and meaningful in penetrating
communist society. Because it was understandable for all the
peoples. It was not aristocratic, it belonged to all of us, the
man on the street - the little guy who was walking on the streets
of Budapest and the little guy who was walking on the streets
of Warsaw or Prague. Just like the little guy walking in the
streets of New York, Los Angeles, or Cleveland.
Try, if you haven't tried
it, the excitement of strumming a Stratocaster. I think that's
the closest you can get to heaven before you really get there.
Rock is about freedom, rock is believing in our freedom and the
freedom of others. I reject the attacks that I hear on rock and
roll music. . .
MUSIC FOR AMERICA - At the beginning of 2003, almost
no one on the Music for America staff had participated in politics
beyond showing up at the polls in November. Now we're all grown
up with our own, national organization. We have offices on both
coasts, and we're part of the biggest grass-roots movement in
American political history. . . Music for America was started
by a group young, disenchanted voters who became active in politics
through the Meetup phenomenon. After the 2000 election and the
Bush Administration's marginalization of the millions who protested
against the buildup to war with Iraq, we collectively came to
three realizations:
1. Protest had become
an impotent act in today's political arena. Protesters tend to
be reactionary and turn more people off of politics than they
turn on; and this administration has shown that no matter how
large an outcry is heard from the people, it will pursue its
own agenda. Millions of people, many of us young and politically
active for the first time, took to the streets on February 15th,
2003, yet the administration, and the media, dismissed us as
a "focus group."
2. Young voters were consistently
being silenced or ignored in the political process. When was
the last time a politician addressed an issue that directly and
immediately concerned someone under 30? With the exception of
some lip service paid to the environment, probably never. When
was the last time a candidate was genuinely interested in what
someone under 30 had to say and altered their policies or positions
accordingly?
3. Culture and politics
are inseparable; and our peers, by participating in culture,
have already been making political statements without realizing
it. Do you dislike the fact that every radio station plays the
same 40 songs? Are you scared of being prosecuted for file sharing?
Do you think it's bullshit that artists have so little control
over their own music and make little - if any - money from CD
sales? These are just a few issues that illustrate the intersection
of culture and politics. Every one of these situations is the
result of a piece of legislation already passed or currently
being lobbied, and every one of these deals with some aspects
of the culture you are participating in every day. We believed
that a lot of people probably felt the same way we did.
FREEWAY
BLOGGING
ROCK
& REBEL
HUNGARY - STEVE LUTTNER CLEVELAND PLAIN DEALER
- Andras Simonyi [above left] came to Cleveland last night to
give credit to rock 'n' roll for helping bring down the Iron
Curtain. Simonyi, the Hungarian ambassador to the United States,
is a hard-core rocker in a pinstriped suit. He believes that
the blaring rock
tunes that were broadcast by Western radio stations into Soviet-dominated
nations such as Hungary in the 1960s, '70s and '80s helped to
undermine the repressive regime. "It was like a window to
the free world," Simonyi, 51, said in an interview before
he spoke to a private group last night at the Rock and Roll Hall
of Fame and Museum. . . In the late '60s, some Western bands
such as Traffic were permitted to tour Hungary. Simonyi said
he and other young Hungarians were greatly influenced by such
groups, watching them play without any limits on what they could
sing about. "You had four or five guys up on the stage with
so much power," Simonyi said. "It was a breath of fresh
air." Efforts to limit or prevent the availability of Western
rock in Hungary at that time were futile, Simonyi said. A black
market of rock albums flourished on the streets of Budapest.
It was unstoppable," he said.
CZECHOSLOVAKIA -
MATT WELCH, REASON - [Vaclav] Havel, the somewhat shy scion of
a bourgeois family (which owned, among other things, the wonderful
Lucerna Theatre on Wenceslas Square), was particularly drawn
to and awed by the "authentic culture" of unbridled
rock music, in a way that recalls the rather prim Orwell's fascination
with Henry Miller. He preferred the Stones to the Beatles (let
alone Clinton's favorite, Fleetwood Mac), and took from rock-influenced
'60s culture "a temperament, a nonconformist state of the
spirit, an anti-establishment orientation, an aversion to philistines,
and an interest in the wretched and humiliated," he wrote
in his underrated 1991 reflection on governing, Summer Meditations.
. .
In April 1975, facing
an utterly demoralized country and an understandable case of
writer's block, Havel committed an act of such sheer ballsiness
that the shock waves are still being felt in repressive countries
30 years later. He simply sat down and, knowing that he'd likely
be imprisoned for his efforts, wrote an open letter to his dictator,
Gustav Husak, explaining in painstaking detail just why and how
totalitarianism was ruining Czechoslovakia.
"So far," Havel
scolded Husak, "you and your government have chosen the
easy way out for yourselves, and the most dangerous road for
society: the path of inner decay for the sake of outward appearances;
of deadening life for the sake of increasing uniformity; of deepening
the spiritual and moral crisis of our society, and ceaselessly
degrading human dignity, for the puny sake of protecting your
own power."
It was the Big Bang that
set off the dissident movement in Central Europe. For those lucky
enough to read an illegally retyped copy or hear it broadcast
over Radio Free Europe, the effect was not unlike what happened
to the 5,000 people who bought the Velvet Underground's first
record: After the shock and initial pleasure wore off, many said,
"Wait a minute, I can do this too!" By standing up
to a system that had forced every citizen to make a thousand
daily compromises, Havel was suggesting a novel new tactic: Have
the self-respect to tell the truth, never mind the consequences,
and maybe you'll put the bastards on the defensive. . .
This act of literary punk
rock was followed, logically enough, by a defense of rock music
that sparked the Charter 77 movement. Or, as Havel told a startled
Lou Reed when he met the Velvet Underground's former frontman
in 1990, "Did you know that I am president because of you?"
In 1968 a rare copy of the Velvet Underground's first record
somehow found its way to Prague. It became a sensation in music
circles and beyond, eventually inspiring the Czech name for their
bloodless 1989 overthrow of Communist rule, "the Velvet
Revolution."
UNITED
STATES -
SAM SMITH, WHY BOTHER?
- In rock and rap -- as in blues and folk music earlier -- people
found that what they couldn't achieve could still be sung or
shouted about. And central to this sound was not just a message
but who was allowed to deliver it. For example, the music webzine,
Fast 'n' Bulbous, described punk this way:
"Punk gives the message
that no one has to be a genius to do it him/herself. Punk invented
a whole new spectrum of do-it-yourself projects for a generation.
Instead of waiting for the next big thing in music to be excited
about, anyone with this new sense of autonomy can make it happen
themselves by forming a band. Instead of depending on commercial
media, from the big papers and television to New Musical Express
and Rolling Stone, to tell them what to think, anyone can create
a fanzine, paper, journal or comic book. With enough effort and
cooperation they can even publish and distribute it. Kids were
eventually able to start their own record labels too. Such personal
empowerment leads to other possibilities in self-employment and
activism.
To move from challenging
record companies to taking on the World Trade Organization was
not an easy or obvious journey, but clearly some of the attitudes
that made the anti-globalization protests possible were formed
in clubs and not at conferences. . .
By the end of the 1990s,
an unremittingly political band, Rage Against the Machine, had
sold more than 7 million copies of its first two albums and its
third, The Battle of Los Angele, (released on Election Day 1999),
sold 450,000 copies its first week. Nine months later, there
would be a live battle of Los Angeles as the police shut down
a RATM concert at the Democratic Convention.
Throughout the 1990s,
during a nadir of activism and an apex of greed, RATM both raised
hell and made money. In 1993 the band, appearing at Lollapalooza
III in Philadelphia, stood naked on stage for 15 minutes without
singing or playing a note in a protest against censorship. .
. In 1997, well before most college students were paying any
attention to the issue, Rage's Tom Morello was arrested during
a protest against sweatshop labor. Throughout this period no
members of the band were invited to discuss politics with Ted
Koppel or Jim Lehrer. But a generation heard them anyway.
IDEAS
BACK TO TOP
DECEMBER 2006
LOCAL CURRENCY
[Several readers expressed
skepticism about Berk Shares, the new local currency in a Massachusetts
community, Here are some things we have previously written on
this topic]
SAM SMITH, SHADOWS OF HOPE, 1994
- During the last recession, the lease for a certain restaurant
in Great Barrington, Mass., expired. The local bank wouldn't
lend restaurateur Frank Tortrello money to move across the street.
So Frank decided to print his own. He called them Deli Dollars.
Each sold for $9 and could be redeemed for $10 worth of food
after six months. Not only did the idea provide Frank with enough
money to make his move, but it spread throughout the community.
A local farm issued notes with the slogan "In Farms We Trust,"
featuring the head of a cabbage instead of the head of a president.
New restaurants followed with their own currency and the local
bills started showing up everywhere, including in church collection
plates.
Others are also reinventing money.
Alternative currency has cropped up in Ithaca NY and is being
used by 700 individuals and business. In Seattle, some have devised
cardboard money. In another town, wooden coins.
Then there's Daisy Alexander,
a retiree from Montclair, New Jersey, and Pepe, a recent immigrant
from Havana, Cuba. They both live in a low-income senior housing
development section of Miami, Florida. At first glance, Daisy
and Pepe seem to have little in common. But they are bound to
each other -- in friendship and through the common bonds of a
new economic system called time dollars or service credits.
Time dollars, described in the book Time Dollars: A Currency
for the 90's by Edgar Cahn and Jonathan Rowe, operate like a
blood bank. People help others in their community and get credits
in a computer data base that they can draw upon in times of need.
Cahn and Rowe describe how time dollars have transformed over
100 communities and how grass-roots groups built the new currency.
Here's how it works for Daisy
and Pepe: Daisy volunteers three days a week tutoring first graders
at the elementary school across the street from her home. Every
week Pepe comes to her house and takes her grocery shopping.
An amputee with a cane, Daisy is dependent on Pepe to provide
this service for her. But no money changes hands. Daisy simply
"cashes in" the time dollars she earns tutoring to
"pay" for Pepe's shopping help. In turn Pepe earns
time dollars to buy services he needs. But Daisy and Pepe gain
in other ways as well. Both are renewed and enthused about the
opportunity for helping, and inspired by the social activities
that the sense of community has produced.
"The potential benefits
of the time dollars concept are limitless. It can touch every
life in every community, ranging from an apartment complex to
an entire nation, every facility, from a nursing home to a university
campus," says author Cahn. "It fosters a sense of financial
independence, camaraderie, community spirit, harmony among age
groups, races, religions, income levels, and even political adversaries."
In each of these cases, citizens
have come to understand that money is just a way that we translate
the value of products and services. Just because one may not
have money does not mean there is no value to be exchanged. It
is simply a matter of coming up with a way to keep track of it
without the services of the Federal Reserve.
SAM SMITH'S GREAT AMERICAN POLITICAL
REPAIR MANUAL, 1997 - It's legal to print your own money provided
that it can't be mistaken for the government kind -- the Secret
Service frowns on that. In fact, says Barbara Brandt in Whole
Life Economics, in the 1860s there were more than ten thousand
different kinds of locally issued bank notes in use in the US
simultaneously, including that issued by state banks. After the
creation of federal banking during the Civil War and a federal
reserve system in the early 1900s, the variety of money in this
country contracted. But in the 1930s, when communities found
themselves with products, needs, skills and labor but little
money, local currencies made a comeback. Writes Brandt: "In
numerous communities, local governments, business associations,
or charitable groups began to create their own money systems
for local use. Local depression money came in many variations:
vouchers that could only be traded in specific stores, or for
specific items, and printed currencies (often called 'scrip')
on paper, cardboard, or even wood, which had to be spent within
the community a certain number of times or before a certain date.
. . By 1933, the New York Times reported that one million Americans
in three hundred communities were using barter or scrip system
to keep their economies going. Today there is a revival of community
money -- or green dollars as it is sometimes called. In 1983,
Michael Linton developed a local exchange trading system on Vancouver
Island that created $350,000 worth of trading in its first four
years."
In Ithaca NY, some half million
dollars worth of local trade has been added to the economy through
Ithaca Hour notes. An Ithaca Hour is based on the average local
wage, about $10 an hour. Ithica Hours have been used to buy plumbing,
child care, car repair, and eyeglasses. They are accepted at
restaurants, movie theatres, bowling alleys, and health clubs.
As Paul Glover explained, "We printed our own money because
we watched federal dollars come to town, shake a few hands, then
leave to buy rain forest lumber and to fight wars. The local
money, on the other hand, stays in our region to help us hire
each other."
||
THE TROUBLE WITH SMASHING THE STATE
CAMERON, GREEN COMMONS - Every
agenda for social change that I've ever heard of that involved
"smashing the state" suffers from a logic design flaw
known as "logical race condition." Anarchists, Marxist-Leninists,
and the modern movement claiming the proper name "Libertarian"
make the same mistake.
Behavior of a system with a logical
race condition is determined by factors that are to a great extent
random or chaotic (randomness and chaos are not the same) or
at least poorly controlled. Race conditions are one of the most
common software design mistakes that create security holes. Something
that should be protected is exposed temporarily, and it's a race
between the end of the exposure and the attacker trying to exploit
it.
When the state is "smashed,"
a race begins. The different cliques who seek power race to grab
it, and whoever gets there first is the new state. Trouble is,
authoritarians usually get there first, because they're unencumbered
with (slow) democratic process. There is no mechanism, during
the transient "smashed state" condition, to prevent
this race from occurring. Power vacuums always get filled. That's
why armed revolutions and coups d'etat tend to make things worse
for the working class.
http://www.greencommons.org/
RECOVERED
HISTORY
PROTESTS, like everything else in
life, can become pretty sterile. But browsing an online history
of punk in DC, we came across a fascinating description of the
role of local punk rockers in the anti-apartheid movement including
drumming the hell out of the South African embassy. Go
to the site, click on enter and then find the embassy on
the map.
WHY SOCIAL MOVEMENTS DON'T WORK
MICHAEL ALBERT, who advocates
what he calls participatory economics, has some important thoughts
on why current day social movements don't do better in this interview.
It's a point your editor has been trying to make for sometime,
as in his 1993 book "Shadows of Hope:"Go back to the
60s and Ralph Nader was about the only public interest lawyer
in town who wore a suit and his wasn't pressed. Today, many advocacy
groups have drifted into the lawyerly style and pace of the establishment
they are supposedly trying to change. They have, in their own
way, become capital institutions, part of the ritualized, status-conscious,
and very safe, trench warfare of the city."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMIDo42fvhs
|
This icon
was designed by Bruce Schneier
as a symbol of individual rights. It represents the right
to privacy and anonymity in the information age. It represents
the rights to an open government, due process, and equal protection
under the law. It represents the right to live surveillance free,
and not to be marked as "suspicious" for wanting these
other rights.
The symbol is not owned by
any organization. There is no platform, no organizational structure,
no meetings. This symbol is in the public domain: uncopyrighted,
untrademarked, unowned. Anyone can use it for any purpose. You
can buy some items with the symbol at this
site |
NOVEMBER 2004
BOYCOTTS ARE BACK
PAUL ROCKWELL, COMMON DREAMS
- In her address at the World Social Forum in Porte Allegre,
Brazil, January 27th, 2003, Arundhati Roy put out a call for
a new strategy of non-cooperation. . . "The U.S. economy,"
she writes, "is strung out across the globe. It's economic
outposts are exposed and vulnerable. Our strategy must be to
isolate empire's working parts and disable them one by one. No
target is too small. No victory too insignificant."
"We could reverse the idea
of economic sanctions imposed on poor countries by Empire and
its Allies. We could impose a regime of people's sanctions on
every corporation that has been awarded a contract in post-war
Iraq. Each one of them should be named, exposed and boycotted-forced
out of business. It would be a great start."
Weekend protests, Roy tells us,
are not enough. "What we need to discuss urgently are strategies
of resistance...Gandhi's salt march was not just political theatre.
In a simple act of defiance, thousands of Indians marched to
the sea and made their own salt. It was a direct strike at the
economic underpinning of the British Empire."
"Already the Internet is
buzzing with elaborate lists of American and British government
products and companies that should be boycotted...They could
become a practical guide that directs and channels the amorphous
but growing fury in the world." . . .
All over the world, peace and
anti-globalization movements are preparing to put Roy's concepts
into practice. They are calling for a new kind of strategy to
end the occupation of Iraq: a well-organized, sustained boycott
of U.S. and British goods. In its range and scope, the coming
boycott (including divestment from U.S. corporations) could resemble
the historic boycott of South African apartheid. . .
Boycotts have often changed the
world. The American Revolution began with the Boston Tea Party.
The non-violent movement that brought down the British Empire
included Gandhi's boycott against British textiles. The Montgomery
bus boycott launched the civil rights movement. The United Farm
Workers in the U.S., led by Caesar Chavez, were unionized through
laborious national boycotts of lettuce and grapes. And of course,
the international boycott of South Africa played a vital role
in bringing down the system of apartheid.
Sporadic and spontaneous boycotts,
local in form, have been taking place in cities throughout the
globe. National Public Radio (U.S.) reports that thousands of
Europeans, repulsed by the election of Bush, are refusing to
buy American goods. One placard in a Paris window says: "Promote
peace. Don't buy American." According to Pulitzer Prize-winning
journalist Seymour Hersh, Europe is simmering. "You're going
to see American profits disappear. American corporations are
going to be in big trouble. It's going to be a mantra not to
buy American. All our major manufacturers are reporting major
slowdowns in Europe. You're going to see the dollar disappear."
OCTOBER 2004
THE GHOST OF SAUL ALINSKY RETURNS
[A wonderful example of the
sort of coalition that can be built around a single issue even
if participants disagree on many other things. In addition to
the groups mentioned below two local car dealers, some resataurant
owners, and the owner of four gas stations have also come out
agains the stadium]
S.A. MILLER, WASHINGTON TIMES
- A diverse coalition including local politicians, black-power
militants, homosexual activists and child-welfare advocates has
emerged to oppose plans for a Major League Baseball stadium in
Southeast, as the D.C. Council today begins debating legislation
for the "sweetheart" ballpark deal. A group calling
itself No D.C. Taxes for Baseball, made up of more than 20 organizations
ranging from the New Black Panther Party to D.C. Action for Children,
plans to demonstrate this morning on the steps of the John A.
Wilson Building, home of the City Council and the mayor's office.
. . Other groups in the coalition are the Campaign for the D.C.
School Budget, the Council of Latino Agencies, D.C. Black Church
Initiative, D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, D.C. Library Renaissance
Project, the D.C. League of Women Voters, Parents United for
the D.C. Public Schools, Save D.C. Parks and Play Spaces, the
Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless and Wider Opportunities
for Women. Although they represent an array of causes, the groups
are united in the belief that the District could better spend
taxpayer money on any one of their missions. They also agree
that when the Montreal Expos relocate to the District, the team
could make RFK Stadium its permanent home.
NOT SO BARE WITNESS
BUT IT'S ALASKA
AFTER ALL. About 375 clothed people formed an S.O.S. and a peace
sign in a snow covered hayfield near Fairbanks, to speak out
against the threatened war in Iraq. The sign, created by a diverse
group of peace activists and church members, was 100 feet tall
and 250 feet wide. For an incredible collection of similar protests
around the world go to Baring
Witness DORIS
PFALMER PFOTO
AUGUST 2003
DISTRIBUTED PROTEST
SYDNEY INDY MEDIA - There's been discussion in
geek circles about using the idea of flash mobs in protests.
The idea is to get a large number of protestors to spread out
over the target area and blanket it for a certain time. Rather
than gathering a couple of hundred people outside the town hall,
put a couple of people on each of the street corners in the central
city, each with a placard and flyers. This way the protest reaches
many more people directly, and in a more approachable way - one
or two people are not as intimidating as a big group, and are
more able to use the space without breaking any laws.
Media impact will most
probably come indirectly. The first protest might get direct
media, as they chase about trying to find out what's going on.
After that I think it's more likely to be viral - people telling
others about what they saw and the flyer they got. I think this
is actually more useful to groups looking for an educational
campaign rather than to apply media pressure to a politician,
for instance.
If the police do ask someone
to move on, they use the Critical Mass technique of moving on,
and making the movement part of the protest. Simply move to the
next corner, and if it's already occupied, those people move
back to the first one. Or move on in turn. That way no one ends
up getting pushed from one end of the city to the other. This
makes the protest very difficult to shut down, as the cops have
to round up a hundred or more small groups of people, each of
whom is doing very little out of the ordinary.
KURO5HIN - When I went to the June 23rd
protest against Bush and his abuse of the office of President,
I held up a provocative sign, "Why did Bush block the investigation
of the 9/11 attacks?" The protest was large and loud - as
it should be. A few thousand people showed up, but many of them
could not find a place to stand in the pens that were set aside
for the protest. After the protest, I walked to Bryant park -
with my sign - and noticed that I got a lot more attention as
a "lone-protestor." People came up to me and asked
questions. Everyone in sight plainly read my sign, and many people
asked me to turn it - so they could get a better view.
It dawned on me that another
way to protest is for everyone to simply carry a sign on the
street, on a designated day. That way more people will see the
message. Imagine how powerful it would be that when you went
to work, or to the shops, saw a person carrying a sign on every
block, no matter where you looked and as far as you went. . .
To comply with the law
and make a stronger message there are several simple rules:
Leave your house within
a precise time, and bring a sign to an area, possibly with limits,
that's convenient to you. If you see another protestor nearby,
acknowledge them and move on. Avoid police. Lower your sign or
walk away when told to. Raise it up again when you are out of
the contended area. Persistent avoidance makes the mob, as a
whole, impossible to stop. Use cardboard, foam-core or paper
signs only. Art supply stores sell cardboard tubes suitable to
use instead of sticks. Police officers can legally confiscate
signs with sticks, claiming that they are potential weapons.
Respond to requests for more information with clear answers or
a printed flyer. What's critical about this form of media is
the timing. Anyone can wear a t-shirt and make very little impact.
However, when very large groups of people wear them on the same
day, it has a deeper resonance.
Other ideas for making
the protest work. Not necessary, but useful:
- Stick to crowded areas.
This one is obvious. Distributed protests only work in busy metro
areas, or malls, etc.
- Also, nighttime is fine
for a vigil or rally, but not for a distributed protest.
- If you insist on using
t-shirt mobs, use a site like cafepress.com to have a T-shirt
drive. After you have enough buyers, email all the buyers and
ask them to wear the T-shirt on the same day and in the same
place. You will need a much shorter timeline and a 3-5 times
higher density for this to be effective, so make sure your venue
is small enough. For example, 500 people wearing the same t-shirt
showing up at a mall at the same time. . . |